As an example, I recently encountered one of these AI bots ^[1]^ in Ibis’s GitHub repository ^[2]^.
References
1. Type: Website. Name: [“Latta”. “Our Mission: Fix The Internet!”.]. Publisher: “Latta AI s.r.o.”. Accessed: 2025-04-03T00:48Z. URI: latta.ai/ourmission/ (Alternative (Archive): web.archive.org/web/2/https://…/ourmission/.). - §“What just happened?”. > Image - The bot seems to automatically scour GitHub repos for issues, and uses AI to generate solutions for them, and subsequently submits them to the issue. 2. Type: Comment. Author: “okFduCi8nl6bRz”. Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “[Bug] Forking an article triggers notifications to be sent for every previous edit up to the point of forking.” (#129). Author: “Kalcifer” (“K4LCIFER”). Publisher: [“Nutomic/ibis”. GitHub.]. Published: 2025-04-03T00:16:06.000Z. URI: github.com/Nutomic/ibis/issues/129 (Alternative (Archive): web.archive.org/web/20250403003232/https://…/129).]. Published: 2025-04-03T00:19:44.000Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T00:58Z. URI: github.com/Nutomic/ibis/issues/129#issuecomment-2… (Alternative (Archive): web.archive.org/web/20250403003232/https://…/129#….). > Image
ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 18 hours ago
At least they’re not hiding that the solution is generated by AI, but the random usernames make me suspect that they’re trying to avoid blocking or banning.