Oops

Comments

• QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  fuck you I’m better

  Image

  source

  • vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Pretty sure this is not ai

    source

    • QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      even if this one specifically isn’t, there’s a lot of versions that are

      Image

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • Blubber28@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      The hand has only four fingers

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • zeroConnection@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Now that’s a meme.

    source
• Sparky@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I love how this meme went from being hand drawn poking fun at Ai slop, to someone slopifying it, to whatever this is…

  source
• manualoverride@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I’ve said this on Lemmy a few times before but 25+ years ago my AI dissertation was on a mushroom identification algorithm, which concluded that even with all the computing power in the world it would not be possible to create an infallible system, and as such was wholly unethical to create, when the cost of failure is death.

  25 years later and AI is still the same, we’ve just decided to give it all that computing power.

  source

  • ignotum@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    By that logic it would be unethical for an expert to give advice, or to even teach others to identify mushrooms, since they too are fallible and it could lead to death?

    Or saying it was unethical to invent cars because they can (and most certainly do) cause deaths.

    Almost everything would be unethical really

    source

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      What makes an expert is the ability to say “this is unequivocally safe to eat, because I can positively identify it based on this and this feature”, as well as “it is not possible/I am not able to confidently identify this mushroom as safe”

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • manualoverride@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Now I don’t profess to remember the entire paper, but one section was certainly “Human factors” the difference between an expert is a human can place emphasis on the dangers above all else which an AI is often incapable of portraying, and the car will still have a human driver.

      The whole point was this was a very limited and narrow language model, with AI image recognition with the assumption that the thing the human was describing and picturing is a mushroom and it’s still fallible. Specifically a mushroom identification program is a really bad idea and absolutely unethical to create, a system that answers any question you ask it where you sort out the guardrails as you go… that’s dangerous.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Just simulate an actual brain on a computer, forget AI.

    We are a few years away from that.

    The real challenge is x10 million speed simulation of a human brain.

    source

    • zeroConnection@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Username checks out

      source
    • manualoverride@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I like your username 😀

      source
• RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Artficial AI intelligence

  source

  • Strider@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Chef’s kiss

    source
• then_three_more@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  All Fungi are edible.

  Some fungi are only edible once.

  • Terry Pratchett

  source
• texture@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  thats the shittyist gravestone ive ever seen. thanks ai

  source
• rosco385@lemmy.wtf ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Damn that pesky artificial intelligence intelligence!

  source
• LORDSMEGMA@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Everything is edible at least once

  source
• zeroConnection@programming.dev ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Just Darwinism at work.

  source
• IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  AII?

  source
• thelunaticmartin@thelemmy.club ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  To be fair, all mushrooms are edible at least once. 🤢🤮😵

  source
• lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Wish we could go back to web search when every answer was 100% correct and this would never ever happen

  Curse you AI for allowing lies on the internet!

  source

  • Glide@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    This sarcasm is completely unwarranted.

    People recognized that random answers on the internet were inclined to be from questionable sources. AI answers provide a sense of authority to what is being said, and then backs up that sense of authority with speech patterns and confidence which we are trained to trust in.

    Web searches were naturally met with a sense of scrutiny, but LLMs lean into habits and patterns that convince us it is right, often subtly.

    source

    • FosterMolasses@leminal.space ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      AI answers provide a sense of authority to what is being said

      I think that’s the real issue, people have with zero discernment consumed the marketing ploy that AI is infallible when in actuality its output has more questionable results than any other mechanism so far.

      If people would simply grasp this then it wouldn’t be so big of a deal. No one had to ban Photoshop for us to eventually catch on that not all photos shared online are authentic lol

      source
    • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      This sarcasm is completely and wholly warranted.

      Did people recognize random answers on the internet as lies when it was new? Of course not. We collectively grew that skill organically as we all came online.

      The next version is completely different - and exactly the same

      source

      • -> View More Comments