Game respects game.
Catch 22 vs. Rosenhan
Submitted 23 hours ago by einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/5a076fd1-04a4-4e13-b20e-b2941ea1568e.jpeg
Comments
JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 19 hours ago
rumschlumpel@feddit.org 20 hours ago
Makes sense, staff has relatively limited contact with patients compared to the other patients, and outside of research, what healthy person would get themselves admitted to a psychiatric hospital on purpose?
dustyData@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Patients lying about symptoms have been a medical issue for centuries. It is the main topic of Baudsillard’s philosophical analysis on simulacra and simulation. Think about it, a soldier who doesnt want to be deployed starts simulating symptoms of a disease to be discharged. How would you catch him, can you? The answer seems straight forward, until you scrutinize it in detail. Neither military or medical knowledge actually have an answer. The kid who doesn’t want to go to school says he has a headache and a tummy ache. How do you validate another’s conscious and sensory experience? Hypochondriacs affirm to develop every disease they hear about. People under stress feel and have somatic symptoms akin to physical diseases, even when functionally nothing is wrong with them. Etcetera. Disease and diagnosis are not so simple and straight forward, not even when talking about bodily functions.
cadekat@pawb.social 22 hours ago
Huh, how accurate/precise (I always mix them up) were the real patients? Did they just identify every other patient as an imposter?
MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 22 hours ago
chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
The high accuracy, low precision regime seems so strange to me! I think not many would call that situation “high accuracy” with most of the shots missing the bullseye!
Korval@lemmy.today 12 hours ago
There’s also a difference between not knowing the difference and always getting them mixed up. The diagram doesn’t help with the stated problem.
Fmstrat@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Sometimes the visual example doesn’t work well when describing math. So an alternate:
Pick a number 1 - 10. 8. Correct and accurate.
Pick a number 1 - 10. 3.1415926535. Uhh, precise, but not accurate.
Smoogs@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
I’d be interested in consistency too.
Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 hours ago
Call that peer reviewed diagnosis
Kenny2999@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
Raising questions about anything at work only gets you more work.
Korval@lemmy.today 12 hours ago
And yet, when the resident with the highest rate of correctly identifying impostors insists that the head psychiatrist is a reptoid, he is pooh-poohed.