Does anybody wanna know the actual mechanics of why Steam is poorly content moderated?
Its because they primarily rely on automated systems, and a very, very small team of inhouse moderstors/admins, as opposed to other comparable platforms (social media networks, basically), that have armies of contracted moderators in low income countries, whose job is to get more and more PTSD every day.
Thats how platforms with comparable amounts of user content do moderation.
Valve absolutely should devote more time and energy to restructuring stages of automated review for user posted comments and content, to improving those review processes, and honestly, should probably just sunset the Steam Forums system, and rethink an entire new approach to it.
But… at the same time, the scale is a significant problem.
Steam has a comparable number of overall daily active users to a major social media platform.
… and the ones that do content moderation, well, they have armies of poor people manually reviewing everything, getting PTSD from that work, and nowadays, likely training an LLM to be a better auto content moderator.
Genuine question for everyone: Do you think that’s an ethically justifiable solution to the problem?
Other genuine question for everyone: What actual technical solution do you think should be implemented?
lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 4 hours ago
Imagine having nothing better to do than writing negative reviews for something that is not even intended for you…
Karen: “I don’t like spicy food… Can someone give me a list with restaurants in my area that serve it, so that I can give them bad reviews?”