That certainly is a shit post.
Ain't no one breaking in
Submitted 1 day ago by PP_BOY_@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/851fe354-0126-47aa-81d8-f9a95599b017.jpeg
Comments
Naich@lemmings.world 1 day ago
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
That’s how you’re supposed to attach hinges to ironwood.
rmuk@feddit.uk 1 day ago
“You don’t need 2FA, just make sure to pick a good password.”
ehyuman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
is this real? genuinely? I also thought if my pw was rsndomly genetated with high entropy, I’d be safe…
Lightfire228@pawb.social 1 day ago
Yes, and no.
If the password is stored properly (hashed and salted), then a high entropy PW will make it nearly impossible for your PW to be extracted from a database dump / data leak
On the other end, if the PW is stored as plain-text, a high entropy PW is useless.
In between, a weak hash algorithm or no salt, a high entropy PW still makes it much harder to extract, but it depends
In general, 2FA is more secure, since it combines 2 different methods of authentication.
- something you know: password
- something you have: the 2FA token (usually on a phone)
This protects the service (as well as the user) against a broader range of attacks. Such as
- password reuse (which nearly everyone does)
- this is particularly bad, because you’re increasing the chance that a weakly designed system will have it’s data stolen, your reused PW and username included
- phising attempts
- low entropy passwords
- replay attacks
- since 2FA tokens are usually time bases (TOTP), they expire after a few minutes and can’t be reused if an attacker manages to intercept one
Among others
basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 8 hours ago
rsndomly genetated with high entropy
≠pick a good password
I’d expect password safes to filter out bad passwords and/or have some rules for that stuff not to happen, but when you just go by randomness you can end up with passwordo like
abcd1234orcat. There is an XKCD (can’t find it) where his dad used a very weak password, but followed his password generation algorithm.
Masterkraft0r@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
how did they get the bead sticking to the wood… like i get the joke, now i’m wondering about the picture that came with it…
Novi@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
You fake it, run the bead against another piece of material it won’t stick to, copper, oxides… bolt it onto the fence and grab a blowtorch for some char effect.
Masterkraft0r@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
but that’s the problem: to me it looks like the bead stuck. i don’t think it would produce a fillet like that if it hadn’t stuck to something. but sure they probably stuck it to something else and then ground that away or whatever
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Don’t mind me, just going around the “well made” gate that’s totally connected to a fence
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Probably put the bolts on the outside, too, so they can be easily removed.
marcos@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I wonder what goes through a person’s mind as they solder that.
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
Nothing. That isn’t soldered. It’s mig welded. Also, the welds wouldn’t look like that if it were actually done right there on the wood. It’s AI\photoshop, or they made the welds elsewhere and then put it up against the wood and torched the area to burn it.
0_0j@lemmy.world 1 day ago
“I done told yo ass no smoking on the clock!”
EndOfLine@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Somebody erm … That’s not how, uhh … They welded umm …
Image
cRazi_man@europe.pub 1 day ago
Reminds me if when a curtain railing in my house was coming off the wall and my mom was adamant that I should use Blue Tac to hold it to the wall till I could make time to f fix the screw anchors and attach it back properly.