They should just block UK traffic like the porn sites do. This is an excellent way to lose a resource the government regularly uses.
Wikipedia loses challenge against Online Safety Act verification rules
Submitted 2 days ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjr11qqvvwlo
Comments
Jyek@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Broadfern@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Bold of you to assume the govt won’t just use the same VPNs they’ll ban the proles from having.
cryptTurtle@piefed.social 2 days ago
yeah pretty much the way it's always been. Rules for thee but not for me
Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 day ago
Bold of you to assume the people advocating for this know how to use a VPN.
Zombie@feddit.uk 2 days ago
To download Wikipedia to your computer for offline use, see here: kiwix.org/en/
maam@feddit.uk 2 days ago
Check out the federated Ibis and data hoard where you can!
user224@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
Unfortunately, it’s an older version from 2024. Last I heard there were some issues with the software used to create these.
Also the images are lower resolution.
Mesa@programming.dev 2 days ago
Guess who becomes much easier to brainwash and control when the kids of this generation don’t have access to unfederated information and education outlets?
The adults of next generation!
Fuck the new world order.
funkyfarmington@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I sure wish Wikipedia would just grow a pair and outright block UK IP addresses.
misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
United Kingdom’s new wiki article:
The United Kingdom (colloquially the U.K.) is a stupid butthead voyeur fetish state located in the Northern Hemisphere…
Paddzr@lemmy.world 2 days ago
They’re gonna lose next election harder than Tories and I’m not even going to feel sorry for them.
It’ll fuck me and my family over big time. More than Brexit did. I was always powerless to change anything here, they’ll vote reform and they’ll go even harder on this shit. Thatcher 2.0 incoming.
rmuk@feddit.uk 14 hours ago
You’re blaming the current government for a law that was brought in by the previous government.
Paddzr@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
I’m sorry, which government told us they’re not going to discuss this even after the very system designed to bring things up to their attention passed the threshold?
You don’t get to hide behind “it was done before we got here” when you’re actively pushing for it.
SpaceShort@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Is it just me or is this Labour government more far right than the previous Tory one?
OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
This is actually a Tory policy, where the law was passed by the previous Tory government and came into force under labour.
That’s not a get out of jail card, because they could have stopped it, and instead choose to continue it, just like they continued the NHS anti trans policies. Or the way they choose to continue the same austerity budget rules.
At this point, I’d say they’re exactly as right wing as the Tories.
SpaceShort@feddit.uk 1 day ago
So it just seems like they’re further right because every successive Tory government is further right than the previous one and Labouare just Tories?
steeznson@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Labour have always had a bad track record of civil liberties. Although as the other reply notes this was a Tory policy initially, I’ve not gone over the proposed amendments to see if they’d have implemented it slightly differently (I suspect not). Unfortunately policies like these are both popular and free for the govt to implement so it’s literally a no-brainer for MPs to vote through without thinking about consequences.
twinnie@feddit.uk 2 days ago
Thank God we’ve got the government here to protect us.
NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
Can’t let the children have access to an Encyclopedia. Too dangerous. We have ChatGPT to give them all the information they need.
cRazi_man@europe.pub 2 days ago
They might look up alt content like “balls” or “boobs”