Data speaks for itself

Comments

• BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  May I add this classic?

  Image

  source

  • echolalia@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Fucking lol. I can’t believe that shit’s real and from Reuters of all places.

    I couldn’t find the graph on an original Reuters article (they must have gotten embarrassed and pulled it down lmao), but Business Insider still has it on their version of the article

    source

    • AccountMaker@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I think the idea behind the graph was to make it look like blood flowing, but the execution was… not the best

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • oxideseven@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    What the actual fuck

    source

    • AtariDump@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Look at the scale one the left.

      (It’s upside down)

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Ashen44@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    there’s actually no fucking way

    source

    • Signtist@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I almost missed the scale on the left. Almost.

      source
  • tetris11@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    that can’t be real… why would gun deaths go down after such a law is passed? I don’t understand the world…

    source
  • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Marlboro

    source
• resting_parrot@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  “Never trust a statistic you didn’t take yourself.”

  source

  • Schneemann@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Should be ‘fake’ not ‘take’, right?

    source

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      History Trivia: No one outside Germany knows that “Churchill-quote” because it was made up by Nazi propaganda.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • resting_parrot@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Yep, that was a typo. Whoops

      source
• Midnitte@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  If you torture the data long enough, hey look at how low I got my p-value.

  source

  • 7empest@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Cull the outliers… Not low enough

    Transform the data… Not low enough

    Normalise the data… Not low enough

    Alter the model by adding random effects… Not low enough.

    The major factors showed a trend towards significance… therefore our hypothesis was met.

    Hello PhD

    source
• tetris11@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  “Yes, the pronounced hammer coefficients as evidenced by these repeated indentations in the flattened curve…”

  source
• doodimus@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Funny how beating a defenseless creature to death with a hammer was just seen as another everyday activity for your typical Saint.

  source
• mo_lave@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  phacking p-hacking

  source