'Cities: Skylines II' Found a Solution for High Rents: Get Rid of Landlords
Submitted 1 month ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to games@lemmy.world
https://www.wired.com/story/cities-skylines-ii-found-a-solution-for-high-rents-removing-landlords/
Comments
Korkki@lemmy.world 1 month ago
VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Wtf… There’s no narrative or throughline, it’s just like… if you distilled “unsettling” and put it on paper.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Only way to turn up to a party tbh…
alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 month ago
I love Victoria 3 because it appeals to the male fantasty, making the rich pay taxes.
sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Do…do women not want the rich to pay taxes? In a game called Victoria, no less?
Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
For clarity, my understanding is that landlords in the game basically live rent free. Some of the buildings spawn with low numbers of apartments, so if you had a building with two apartments, 1 would be a landlord and the other tenet would pay x2 the rent.
So effectively they’re changing from having local landlords to instead paying rent to a distant landlord.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 month ago
That first system sounds accurate to life, and the second like property taxes.
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Is CS2 an actually playable game yet? I remembered trying to play it on my 4090 and getting 60fps on a blank map, and scrolling was somehow jittery.
isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Part of me feels like it ended up similar to the situation Ark is in now where the player base is split. I’ve honestly not heard anything much about CS2 recently which is curious. It was a shame it was such a let down on release after how much love CS got.
SARGE@startrek.website 1 month ago
That could mean that the already content players are still happy with their game, and the vocal haters don’t have enough to hate on that doesn’t sound petty.
I say that as someone who has not played CS2 and plays 1 heavily modded… So the fuck do I know
Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 month ago
Yeah fps is fine in game but simulation speed is terrible. Your game sim speed will grind to a crawl once you place a bit of high density.
Games got custom maps and assets and is building up a range of great mods.
LengAwaits@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Cities: Skylines II Found a Solution for High Rents: Get Rid of Landlords
For months, players have been complaining about the high rents in the city-building sim. This week, developer Colossal Order fixed the problem by doing something real cities can’t: removing landlords.
The rent is too damn high, even in video games. For months, players of Colossal Order’s 2023 city-building sim, Cities: Skylines II, have been battling with exorbitant housing costs. Subreddits filled with users frustrated that the cost of living was too high in their burgeoning metropolises and complained there was no way to fix it. This week, the developer finally announced a solution: tossing the game’s landlords to the curb.
“First of all, we removed the virtual landlord so a building’s upkeep is now paid equally by all renters,” the developer posted in a blog on the game’s Steam page. “Second, we changed the way rent is calculated.” Now, Colossal Order says, it will be based on a household’s income: “Even if they currently don’t have enough money in their balance to pay rent, they won’t complain and will instead spend less money on resource consumption.”
The rent problem in the city sim is almost a little too on the nose. Over the last few years real-world rents have skyrocketed—in some cases, rising faster than wages. In cities like New York, advocates and tenants alike are fighting against the fees making housing less and less affordable; in the UK, rent is almost 10 percent higher than it was a year ago. From Hawaii to Berlin the cost of living is exorbitant. Landlords aren’t always to blame, but for renters they’re often the easiest targets.
From this perspective, perhaps Cities’ simulator is too good. Prior to this week’s fix, players found themselves getting tripped up on some of the same problems government officials and city planners are facing. “For the love of god I can not fix high rent,” wrote one player in April. “Anything I do re-zone, de-zone, more jobs, less jobs, taxes high or low, wait time in game. Increased education, decreased education. City services does nothing. It seems anything I try does nothing.”
On the game’s subreddit, players have also criticised “how the game’s logic around ‘high rent’ contrasts reality,” with one player conceding that centralized locations with amenities will inevitably have higher land values. “But this game makes the assumption of a hyper-capitalist hellscape where all land is owned by speculative rent-seeking landlord classes who automatically make every effort to make people homeless over provisioning housing as it is needed,” the player continued. “In the real world, socialised housing can exist centrally.”
This is true. It exists in Vienna, which the New York Times last year dubbed “a renters’ utopia.” Except, in Vienna the landlord is the city itself (it owns about 220,000 apartments). In Cities: Skylines II, the devs just got rid of landlords completely.
The change in-game will have “a transition period as the simulation adapts to the changes,” and the developer “can’t make any guarantees” with how it will impact games with mods. Although the update aims to fix most of the problems at hand, that doesn’t mean players should never expect to see rent complaints again. When household incomes are too low to pay, tenants will be loud about it. “Only when their income is too low to be able to pay rent will they complain about ‘High Rent’ and look for cheaper housing or move out of the city.” Maybe it’s time players had a few in-game tenant groups of their own.
KellysNokia@lemmy.world 1 month ago
If you ever wanted to see an alleged IRL rent hellscape simulator take a look at this
starchylemming@lemmy.world 1 month ago
RL patch when?
JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I’m not gonna say it’s a bad idea, I’m just gonna say I think I’ve seen this one
Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 month ago
It’s a very good idea and much better than the stupidity of the current real estate market where all over the world entire generations cannot ever afford housing.
SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
In real life, Qaddafi got rid of landlords in Libya. It resulted in a lot of housing problems.
Some people don’t have wealthy parents that can buy them a place to live outright. There is a need to have housing available that doesn’t require someone to have wealthy parents or get out a large loan. The ability to rent a place is important.
The real problem is the high cost to own a place to live which results in people having to rent when they’d rather own a home.
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 1 month ago
We have those IRL as well, condos and townhouses. Many people choose to go for those.
return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 month ago
where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
There’s a difference between “we removed landlords and prices went down” and “we allowed anyone to pay as much as they can, especially if they’re poor, and somehow now the average rent is lower”.
Clickbait title, but lemmy swallows as usual, cuz it fits the narrative.