At this rate in 2028 they’ll be at -11th
Irish Journalist Excellence
Submitted 1 year ago by UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/eb763139-0c10-4384-8698-061e4abf6fae.jpeg
Comments
nifty@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I like how the position axis starts at 0, maybe that’s for a year they don’t qualify
Ejh3k@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If the article is about how just a few countries are dominating the podiums, I think this is an incredibly effective graph.
wolfpack86@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The values are even incorrect. 2008, they got 63rd. 2024 they got 19th.
dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 1 year ago
…does it not say 63rd for 2008?
wolfpack86@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah it does. I fucked up, they actually placed 64th and not 63rd. Importantly I’m not a reporter.
the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This reminds me of that chart showing gun deaths over a few years that showed the line going down the more deaths there were. That made sense graphically, they colored it in to look like blood dripping down, but this is just dumb.
ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
The Y axis is the absolute number of medals and the labels for each data point are relative rankings. If one country got all the medals except one and Ireland got that one remaining medal, there would be a data point at Y=1 with the label “2nd”.
Trex202@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That thery might work if the data point labels didn’t directly correspond with the Y axis labels.
wolfpack86@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah but it’s not. At all.
They’ve beent taking single digit medals.
usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
At this rate, at the next Olympics they’ll be in -10.5 place!
fubarx@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
WE’RE NUMBER ZERO! WE’RE NUMBER ZERO!
Photon@feddit.org 1 year ago
Tbh I don’t see where this is bad (except maybe the 0 label). Why should “up” always be “better”? There are countless other examples where this is not the case. Or am I missing something here?
chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It measures place, rather than performance (like medals got). It’s a line graph, when there’s no events between the data points, so it should be a bar graph. And yeah, up is better.
friendlymessage@feddit.org 1 year ago
A bar chart for this kind of data makes no sense to me as the bar doesn’t really represent anything. A scatter plot is a good choice and adding a connection line for readability is imo not so bad. It should however be inverted going up to 1 and not down to 0.
DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 year ago
Line chart is fine here as it’s the same measure over time.
UnbalancedFox@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
My nose is bleeding 😪
snue@feddit.dk 1 year ago
are their any communities for bad graphs ? :))
HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Samsy@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
Their must be one. Plz create they.
salmoura@lemmy.eco.br 1 year ago
I thought someone would of created it by now.
pyre@lemmy.world 1 year ago
c/dataisugly