Hoofta.
Not that I need to tell anybody here, but if there’s an arena with bigger egos than politics, it’s academia. I’d pay money just to watch the carnage.
Defense
Submitted 3 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/b82fa03a-bb43-4987-8429-6ac96d92ccc7.jpeg
Comments
Got_Bent@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months ago
At least in academia they deserve it.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 months ago
You have no idea.
SGforce@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
Could someone do a dissertation about exactly that?
NegativeInf@lemmy.world 3 months ago
“Your Thesis Is Wrong and You Should Feel Bad: On Cherry-Picking and the Reproducibility Crisis in Academic Research”
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months ago
I want to see that so much
nintendiator@feddit.cl 3 months ago
I’ll make my thesis about the methodology issues in that one!
ClanOfTheOcho@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Attack the judges, jury, and executioners? Bold strategy, Cotton.
PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 3 months ago
The trump method
ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 months ago
To be fair, Trump does have a rabid base.
thesohoriots@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Earn bonus points with the phrase “your reach exceeds your grasp”
propter_hog@hexbear.net 3 months ago
Fucking hell, didn’t expect that one, sending this to my advisor
ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
This is how books were written 100 years ago, you had to spend like the first third explaining why everyone else is wrong before getting to the part where you claim to be right.
PAPPP@lemmy.sdf.org 3 months ago
I initially didn’t do enough of that in my PhD thesis (CS, about some weird non-frame-based imaging tech that is still only of academic interest), and my committee demanded I add more stake-claiming favorable comparisons to other tech to my introduction before I submitted.
TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Do we not do that anymore?
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 months ago
Quacks still do, the rest doesn’t