nintendiator

@nintendiator@feddit.cl

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Hemoglobin⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I mean, you can even suicide on water (inb4 dihydrogen monoxide memes). This is just normal biology of a normal thing in the world.

  Heck, forget water: you can even suicide on the ground below your feet. It’s just usually lots more work.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Defense⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I’ll make my thesis about the methodology issues in that one!

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨A legend has passed⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Damn, I had my hopes on this one. Two misses in one month is a pretty bad record.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Style + Ease⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  It’s the kind that drives Conservation Efforts and Media Attention. So yeah, I guess they tend to be colorful.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Style + Ease⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Next on your road: charismatic megafauna!

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Elsevier⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  That can easily be fixed at the source: as the author of the paper, you can just license it to be open if you want.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨We need a larger one. Yes, for the last time. Pleeeeeeeeeease!⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Honest question: why is a larger collider even needed? Just make the particles run more loops around your track.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨We live in a meritocracy.⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Descriptivistic nanomachines, son!

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨We live in a meritocracy.⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  And “How much they are?” is a question. See? Question mark right there.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Publishers are a cancer. Knowledge is meant to be shared, freely.⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Doesn’t publishing come after getting your stuff reviewed by peers?

  (But even if it’s done after, then self-publishing then makes it easier for peers to get your work to review it, which should increase overall quality)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Publishers are a cancer. Knowledge is meant to be shared, freely.⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  only option is pay out of pocket

  Or, ya know, self publish.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Schrodinger⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  No need to even bring it to people’s attention. The guy is known among normies for a maybe virtual cat at best and not much else. That’s his contribution and importance to humanity and general audiences won’t need to recall anything else. Crying to bring to attention the whole pedophile thing outside of academia (or heck, even in academia, how does it even affect the experiment?) is pretty much self-defeating in that sense.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Schrodinger⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Sure. Which other scientist who first designed Schrödinger’s Cat experiment should I refer to by name, then?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Evolution isn't linear.⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Digimon: [day one] Oh this poor kitten,

  [midseason] kitten evolves into buff lion anthro then dies on you.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Come on, science!⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  If successful it could

  Wanna bet what capitalism is going to say about that?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨If a universal basic income started today with the stipulation that you had to put 40 hrs/wk towards making the world a better place or solving societal problems, how would you spend your time?⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Disregarding the fallacy in your opening, and calling things for what they are:

  If a conditional basic income started today with the stipulation that I had to put 40 hrs/week towards making the world a better place or solving societal problems,

  I would spend them by becoming a politician and implementing true Universal Basic Income.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨If you're selected for jury duty (US), should you give up your anonymous social media accounts?⁩ ⁨⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Wow this is tremendously informative for me as a Non American, yeah. Thanks! in particular explaining how the Fifth works.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨If you're selected for jury duty (US), should you give up your anonymous social media accounts?⁩ ⁨⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Not an American, but if a lawyer / whatever during jury selection insist on trying to pry open one of your social accounts, couldn’t you stop them on their tracks simply citing the First Amendment (plus maybe the Fourth or whichever is “can’t be forced to give testoimony against yourself”)? Forcing someone to reveal information that might make them persecutable by the government on the grounds of the government may not like their speech sounds like literal application of the 1st here.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Frankly?

  I wouldn’t mind.

  I (or anyone really) can’t have a net positive effect on each and everyone in the world and that’s fine because I’m not a god nor paid that much. If “some god” comes complain at me, I’ll just point them at the nearest mirror.

  That doesn’t mean I’m going to be an ass about life, simply because of the same precept. But there’s a wide gap between “worrying about everyone” and “taking shit from anyone” that I’m very comfortable maneuvering in.

  When you are not a god, ignorance is bliss (mental health).

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Help Xi Find His Hair!⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  CTRL+F “CCP intelligentsia copypasta”

  0 results

  Come on reddit lemmy, we can do better.