Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

We live in a meritocracy.

⁨819⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨fossilesque@mander.xyz⁩ to ⁨science_memes@mander.xyz⁩

https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/505ac81e-371b-42b7-bc03-7fa4ac76274c.jpeg

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • gi1242@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    academic journals now only provide a service to authors. they used to distribute… but the articles are available free on the arxiv, pubmed, authors websites, etc. the peer review and typesetting journals do is a joke and no author will pay for that.

    the value journals have now is mainly to the author, because the prestige of getting accepted by the journal helps with the authors career. publishers figured out that authors will pay for this, so here we are … 🙄

    source
    • bleistift2@feddit.de ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I used to have trust in the peer review process, thinking this is why it takes months or years for a paper to get published. Are you telling me it’s not real?

      source
      • gi1242@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        iwriting reviews is time consuming, unpaid, and doesn’t help the reviewers career. so it takes a while because reviewers are already busy and don’t prioritize writing reviews too much.

        quality of the reviews is questionable. 10% of the reviews are through and provide valuable feedback. the remaining 90% are cursory “yeah this is interesting, publish it” or “not interesting/outside scope”.

        very very few reviews find and report scientific errors

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • wewbull@feddit.uk ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Sounds like you already worked it out.

        source
      • pennomi@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Depends on what journal is reviewing the paper.

        source
  • max@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The value of a scientists, how funny this world is

    source
  • scytale@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That expression is hilarious. What’s the name of the template?

    source
    • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It’s from the movie Monster House

      source
  • OpenStars@discuss.online ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    In so many more ways than one… :-(

    source
  • Mikufan@ani.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Why Don’t make your own journal with free distribution?

    source
    • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This tracks the Open Access movement in academia: tagteam.harvard.edu/remix/oatp/items

      source
    • flyos@jlai.lu ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Some people did, look up the Peer Community Journal. Backed up by more and more organisations.

      source
    • gi1242@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      there are plenty of low cost open access journals run by nonprofits and professional societies. however junior researchers when building their reputation try and publish in journals that are as prestigious as possible, without worrying about cost, apc, open access etc.

      source
      • Mikufan@ani.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Kinda sad that this is necessary or seen as necessary

        source
  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    “How much are they?” is a question.

    “How much they are” is a statement.

    source
    • nintendiator@feddit.cl ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      And “How much they are?” is a question. See? Question mark right there.

      source
      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Incorrect.

        source
      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Why think that work you how?

        source
        • -> View More Comments