I honestly think this is overblown.
Republicans have destroyed decorum as well as the truth and patriotism.
When Obama killed Bin Laden they shat on him.
When Pelosi was attacked they shat on her.
When children were killed in any of the mass shootings, they shat on them.
When the pandemic happened they shat on doctors and first responders.
So this sense of “coming together after an event” isn’t a thing anymore. Republicans killed it. No-one that didn’t love Trump before is going to be moved by this shit.
Uplink@programming.dev 5 months ago
Not from the US and I don’t understand why one would support a candidate just because he survived an assassination attempt. Can somebody explain the logic behind this?
Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de 5 months ago
I guess it made him look stronger or cooler or something. He’ll probably also use this to say that Democrats are trying to kill him, insinuating that they don’t mind killing people to achieve their goals.
WraithGear@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Which is funny because killing people to achieve his goals is Trumps political platform.
tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 months ago
It does seem weird that a felonious rapist would get a boost from not dying. Even more baffling that he’s likely a pedo.
But lying and spinning by a corrupt machine can go along way in a country full of ignorant assholes.
GBU_28@lemm.ee 5 months ago
It’s not a purely American phenomena. It paints a candidate in a human light, as they “survived” a very public tragedy, yet are still strongly pursuing what they think is right.
It’s a humanizing event.
This is not a pro trump comment.
TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 5 months ago
This is the truth. This is what everyone has been trying to communicate.
Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 5 months ago
American here, I haven’t heard one peep about Trump getting more support because of this outside of Lemmy.
Whether or not the Trump campaign can spin this in their favor depends entirely on the motive of the assassin. If they were just some nutjob, there really isn’t much they can do.
If, on the other hand, the assassination attempt was politically motivated, there are two ways I can see this whole thing being spun:
“The other side knows I’ll win and the only way to stop me is to kill me. If you don’t like them, vote for me because I scare them and they hate me.”
“The other side is so evil and vile they would stoop to try to kill me rather than have a fair election”.
In the event that the assassin wasn’t some flavor of crazy, spin number one is more likely than spin number two, but they’re hardly mutually exclusive.
chicagohuman@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Does it matter if it’s true? It hasn’t in the past
Evotech@lemmy.world 5 months ago
PredictIT increased the chabce that trump would win to 66% from 60.
Uplink@programming.dev 5 months ago
I don’t think the motivation matters. They will just spin it in any way they think it will benefit them.
Soundhole@lemm.ee 5 months ago
I don’t necessarily see any proof of this, either. I’m not sure where this narrative is coming from, it’s very strange.
Daxtron2@startrek.website 5 months ago
Reagans assassination attempt
nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 5 months ago
i heard somebody say that bolsenaro got a boost in the polls after he got stabbed
EtherWhack@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Depending on how the event is spun (story-wise), an attempt like this could make the other candidate’s party seem unhinged enough that one of their members would do (and apparently fail badly at) this.
To a lot of people, whether the shooting is or isn’t affiliated doesn’t really get questioned no matter what they hear, as what party would hurt itself? They’ll immediately think there is some conspiracy (the human psychology loves these rabbit holes) to make it seem like any favoring affiliation to the target’s political side is staged by the other.
Kaboom@reddthat.com 5 months ago
Voting against the people who got their base that riled up