Add a citation counter below it to keep track of how far you’ve come.
Citation: ||||| ||||/ ||||| ||||\ ||||| |||
Hardcore
Submitted 11 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/83b23d57-9533-4b5f-9d8e-f5aeb803cd52.jpeg
Comments
42yeah@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Crackhappy@lemmy.world 11 months ago
To really go hardcore, the counters should be brands, not tattoos.
bananabenana@lemmy.world 11 months ago
QR code for the DOI would be better IMO
mipadaitu@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Might be obsolete after a bit though. A QR code only points to a URL and that might change (unlikely, but after 20 years…)
barsoap@lemm.ee 11 months ago
QR codes can contain just about anything, including the URI (
doi:foobar) form that the tattoo uses. QR codes themselves will probably go the way of USB: In a million years there’s going to be someone looking at the driver code saying “you sure we can’t get rid of those early versions” just for someone to chime in saying “your keyboard still uses USB1”.Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 11 months ago
A QR code can also just contain plain text. It’s just usually used for URLs.
JoBo@feddit.uk 11 months ago
DOIs are forever. It’s why they exist.
GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.world 11 months ago
You can make QR codes that copy text to a clipboard right? Can’t you just make it a DOI search term? Or pay $2/yr for a redirect domain that you can point to where you want later
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 11 months ago
A QR Code encodes a string of text. In can be a URL, or anything else. Like the DOI string above, a quote, or whatever. You can’t do full Unicode I think, it’s 8859-1, or something like that, although there’s also an Asian variant.
flora_explora@beehaw.org 11 months ago
Not only the first paper but it apparently was published in nature:
baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 11 months ago
And it is actually published by OP (in the image), finally, a meme that is not a repost.
fermionsnotbosons@lemmy.ml 11 months ago
Good for her, well done! Not as pretty of a tattoo as a well-drawn organic molecule, IMO, but publishing is hard and worthy of celebration when you succeed.
AtariDump@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 11 months ago
But also different title and authors 🤔
plistig@feddit.de 11 months ago
And a different doi than in the tattoo. But without a paywall!
AtariDump@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Well crap.
weariedfae@lemmy.world 11 months ago
That’s pretty dope.
crazyCat@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
Wow that’s a cool way to celebrate
uservoid1@lemmy.world 11 months ago
“Recruit and retain a diverse workforce” doi.org/10.1038/s41570-020-0214-z
qaz@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Only 24,99 € / 30 days, what a steal
vox@sopuli.xyz 11 months ago
i like that “open access” label just below the paywall
venoft@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Why is this paper written like an opinion piece?
vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 months ago
IM JUST ASKING QUESTIONS GUISE
casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
Because modern day social scientists have legitimately lost the plot and think it’s more important to for careers to be built by ethnicity rather than merit, and call any alternative a matter of facilitating and furthering “privilege” with no data to back up their claims.
I know people who have been pushed out of labs and bullied into quitting their degree programs just because they were hetero white males. I am unfortunately not kidding, not exaggerating, and the details I am leaving out only make the circumstances worse.
Academics have quietly acknowledged that academia itself is dying because of this and other issues that call the validity of modern science literature into question.
I have a friend who is published in Nature, and I’m very tempted to send them this article. They have already stated that being published in Nature means nothing these days to anyone who actually pays attention to what they publish, and this is just further proof of it.
For all who digress: I welcome all downvotes. I am not trolling, I am not inciting, I am laying out the honest truth as it has been illustrated to me by credible academics over the past five years. I don’t care what you learned in social sciences. I don’t care who published what. You seek to undermine academia by making merit moot and for that I respect you less than I even respect Silicon Valley-- that is to say, dismally little. And idgaf what you label me because if you are on the other side of this, your words mean absolutely nothing to me and never will.
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 11 months ago
It sounds like a Lemmy post
abscond@lemmy.world 11 months ago
It looks like an opinion piece because the article is a comment. It indicates that at the top of the article. Scientific journals often solicit a small number of commentaries that address issues in their field.
Turun@feddit.de 11 months ago
sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/…/s41570-020-0214-z
akilou@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
Think it’s a picture of Brea or Diane?