casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer
@casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on He came with receipts 5 months ago:
Oh right, I forgot that funding and companies manifest solely from engineers’ desires to build things. Silly me.
- Comment on Netflix Announces Minecraft Animated Series 5 months ago:
I’ve never met any Minecraft player that played Story Mode, but a few had primary school siblings that did.
- Comment on Anti-venom? 5 months ago:
bite it back
- Comment on He came with receipts 5 months ago:
Right, I didn’t mean to imply that the practice was uncommon, just that using it as a defense of ego so readily was eyebrow-raising. I’m no academic, but I feel like I’d lose respect for my advisor had they used the paper I worked hard on as a way to boost numbers used as personal defense in some petty squabble in a public forum.
- Comment on He came with receipts 5 months ago:
Big moves like founding SpaceX
- Comment on He came with receipts 5 months ago:
SpaceX
- Comment on He came with receipts 5 months ago:
SpaceX
- Comment on He came with receipts 5 months ago:
Yeah, even if he is advising or contributing, the way he put it sounds very disingenuous like he’s trying to inflate the number for his argument. Which MIGHT mean there likely was not many with immediately recognizable significance in that time (don’t yell at me, I have not taken the time to verify this).
Either way, the way he responded comes across as very “I’m published, you’re not, neener neener!” which is not a good look for anyone with a doctorates.
Also, genuine question, how significant was the contribution of LeNet-5 to the field of deep learning vs Neocognitron?
- Comment on He came with receipts 5 months ago:
Because he is not your run-of-the-mill tech billionaire.
He’s an asshole, yes, but you don’t see Zuckerberg, Gates, Bezos or anyone else make the kind of big moves he does.
- Comment on He came with receipts 5 months ago:
He founded SpaceX, which is arguably more important than anything else he or any of Silicon Valley are typically involved with.
- Comment on He came with receipts 5 months ago:
Really? Jack Dorsey says it’s suffering from the same mistakes Twitter made. Is it still better than Mastodon? I thought Mastodon was as close as we got to solving the problem for now, just lacking adoption and with your typical fedi-drawbacks
- Comment on Edison 5 months ago:
If you don’t recognize the number, answer in a funny accent. That’s how you defeat the voice harvesters.
ring ring Sombrero repair, como es?
ring ring [deep voice] Investigations.
ring ring HJECKIN?
ring ring [high pitched voice] OOIIO BO IMA SO GLAD YE RANG DOLLINGA
ring ring thinkyefurcullinpapajhonzzewoodyalacktatryourpapalopadoussoosageasperigusdoughdopoloostoday?
ring ring [monkey noises]
ring ring OOOOOHHHHHHHH COME ON EILEEN, I BEG OF YA PLEASE
ring ring [raspy voice] Jerome?
ring ring [dictation voice, right up against microphone] THANK YOU FOR FALLING KMART. PLEASE LET US KNOW WHAT YOU ARE CALLING ABOUT SO WE MAY DIRECT YOUR CALL
ring ring [moaning so intense it would make Sarah Grey blush]
ring ring WEAR MAH CHIL’ SUPPORT AT JEROME
ring ring [play Gilbert Garfield directly into microphone]
- Comment on Of course, it's the way you tell them... 5 months ago:
World’s oldest recorded diatribe
- Comment on Frack you, Walmart 5 months ago:
Right, I thought that might be what you were referring to. This is where we get into weeds technically:
Those regulations apply to active jamming, which is the use of an electronic device(s) to emit signals that interfere with lawfully approved channels. It is important to note that this holds no practical bearing upon structures as they by definition cannot engage in active jamming, only in passive blocking or coincidental interference.
What’s being experienced with Walmart’s lack of 5G is likely due to the fact that 5G does not penetrate walls very well. Combine this with the fact that you have hundreds of devices in the same enclosed space trying to talk to the same tower some miles away on the lower bandwidth 5G channel that can penetrate walls, and you can see how 5G access is effectively being “denied” simply by the nature of the business. Walmart could implement an on-premises 5G relay to solve the issue, but why would they want to take on that tech debt? All they are required to do by law is make sure E911 is not impeded by the building or operations of the business. They don’t owe you access to other radio waves when on their premises.
If this regulation were to somehow be applied to passive blocking like what I’ve described, then Faraday cages would be illegal-- which aren’t, again as long as E911 is not impeded. This would also make high security bamk vaults illegal due to the thick wall construction.
- Comment on Frack you, Walmart 5 months ago:
which FCC regulations in particular?
- Comment on Big Science 5 months ago:
And studies are scientific, but are not science itself. A study can be intentionally misleading in bad faith, but that doesn’t mean every researcher in that field is acting in bad faith, just the author, publisher, and perhaps reviewing peers.
Anyone can right a paper. And if they right it on something obscure and bespoke enough, it can be difficult for someone to question their work. Doing so is the duty of peer reviewers, and sometimes these peers for whatever reason will fail to smell the bullshit or raise issue about smelling it. Then the honus is on the publisher to retract falsified papers.
This is why citations are like gold to postdocs. It’s what builds their credibility, and that credibility is one of the most important aspects of the academic and scientific world.
- Comment on And it went Gold 5 months ago:
Around the world
(if we do this 137 more times, we’ll have sang the whole song, i counted)
- Comment on And it went Gold 5 months ago:
Music’s gonna set ya free
- Comment on Overthrow a Government and Install a Puppet Dictator? The CIA will do it for Bananas! 5 months ago:
The fun part is the shit you can’t talk about without disappearing.
Good times, good times.
- Comment on It is apparently controversial 5 months ago:
Non-misandry/-sexism version:
A meme was made posing the humorous rhetoric of whether sex A would rather be stuck on an island with sex B or a bear. No distinction was made about the character of the sex B persona or the bear persona, it was left as a fill-in-the-blank for those who respond to rhetoric.
Sex B largely understood this to be stereotyping and hate speech directed towards them at large without any distinction about whom the rhetoric was implying. Audience was then divided between those who recognize equality and sexism versus those who believe either only apply to marginalized groups
With love from an agender
- Comment on It is apparently controversial 5 months ago:
he just don’t care to be there with their basic ass
- Comment on Images leak of Valve's next game, and it's an Overwatch-style hero shooter 5 months ago:
So Team Fortress 3
- Comment on Anon's sister is a NEET shut-in 6 months ago:
This is behavioral therapy, which you could say is a responsive mode of “parenting” that is highly effective.
- Comment on The second matchup of the tournament 6 months ago:
Well Todd, it looks like Wolf might be the clear winner in today’s matchup but what I think spectators are really want to know is how the next round will fare.
- Comment on The second matchup of the tournament 6 months ago:
They’re inexperienced with them
- Comment on hot dog 6 months ago:
yes.
- Comment on hot dog 6 months ago:
as long as we die between some buns
- Comment on hot dog 6 months ago:
she even got that weiner
- Comment on Hardcore 6 months ago:
I dismiss modern social sciences because they have made it impossible not to dismiss them by making absurd claims that are easily refutable and arguably do nothing to better society-- how the fuck is hiring or granting tuition assistance based on applicant’s identity equate to social progress, when their identity makes up so little of their effectual background?
If race is a social construct, then tell me why the fuck they insist on making things about race more than it ever was before instead of embracing objective equality?
This incongruence is the exact reason extremist groups have no trouble finding new members-- anyone embracing these half-cooked, bad-faith movements is actively driving neutral parties into the arms of the extremists. By treating the neutral party as the enemy, you make them your enemy. I affiliate with no social groups because of how awful they are, but I assure you I will always undermine DEI however I can in my day-to-day job duties simply because those behind the movement threw the first punch.
I see humans as humans. And I don’t give a flying fuck what anyone else says they are. They are humans, they will be treated like humans the same as all other humans are treated, no better, no worse, and their identity means zilch.
- Comment on Hardcore 6 months ago:
commenting before I go to bed to point out you have contributed nothing to this discussion.