Mandelbrot

Comments

• captainjaneway@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Resolution limits

  source

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Nonsense. Good gardeners trim to the subatomic level

    source
  • Pulptastic@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It would still take a while to edge individual blades of grass

    source
• ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I actually met Benoit Mandelbrot when I was an intern at IBM’s T. J. Watson research center in the late '80s. I was randomly walking around the building and passed by a tiny office with “B. Mandelbrot” on the door. I stuck my head in, saw an old bald dude sitting there and said “are you the Bernard Mandelbrot?” He said “yes” and I said “oh” and walked on. Apparently he didn’t hear that I said “Bernard” instead of “Benoit”.

  source
• charlytune@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  What does the ‘B’ in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for?

  Benoit B. Mandelbrot

  source

  • Akasazh@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    ‘I’m so meta even this acronym’

    source
• expatriado@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  this is a draft, the cartoonist is still working on the third panel

  source
• prof@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  There’s a cool rabbit hole you can dive into when it comes to coastline lengths of some countries. Specifically the UK.

  Depending on who measured the coastline and with which method the results can be wildly different because there’s always some form of simplification required. See this video for example: Link

  source

  • TheControlled@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Try Canada on for size.

    source
• QProphecy@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  The devil is in the details.

  source
• khuldraeseth@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Not a mathematician. Does the boundary have infinite length, or just infinite detail?

  source

  • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Yes

    source
  • Subverb@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It can’t have infinite length without infinite detail if you think about it.

    source

    • Bolt@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Not in a finite space, no. But it could have infinite detail without infinite length (like the square with corners folded in to approximate a circle).

      source
• Kolanaki@yiffit.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Mandlebrotwurst. Infinite sausage.

  source
• 42yeah@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Don’t look closer, or you won’t be able to come out ever again.

  source
• comrade19@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Can someone explain pls

  source

  • Frenchy@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This is a fractal made from the Mandelbrot set. I guess the joke is that the more you zoom in the edges the more detail there is, so doing them would be pretty much impossible.

    source

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      This shows the phenomenon pretty well. I like to watch this once in a while to remind myself that I know nothing about anything.

      source
  • Callmesuperman@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    From the mandelbrot boundary wiki: “Images of the Mandelbrot set exhibit an infinitely complicated boundary that reveals progressively ever-finer recursive detail at increasing magnifications”

    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_set

    source

    • comrade19@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Thankyou. Even as a concept I find it creepy

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• RavenFellBlade@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Pathological monsters!

  source

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    A splinter in my eye

    source
• Aceticon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It definitelly doesn’t pay to be detail-oriented when doing a fractal lawn…

  source
• MehBlah@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Just more turtles all the way down.

  source