cross-posted from: linux.community/post/767456
I read post about people quitting jobs because they’re boring or there is not much to do and I don’t get it: what’s wrong with being paid for doing nothing or not much at all?
Examples I can think of: being paid to be present but only working 30 minutes to 2 hours each 8 hours, or a job where you have to work 5 minutes every 30 minutes.
What’s wrong with reading a book, writing poetry or a novel, exercising, playing with the smartphone… and going home to enjoy your hobbies fully rested?
Am I missing something?
alyth@lemmy.world 8 months ago
They have the wrong idea here. Most people who have nothing/nothing meaningful to do at work still have to be present and give the semblance of working. Or do bullshit tasks that nobody will ever check, but if you don’t do them you risk losing your job and your income.
Being bored out of my mind is extremely exhausting to me.
KeepFlying@lemmy.world 8 months ago
This. And even if you do have time to let your mind wander you can’t actually “do” your hobbies at work. At least for me I can’t do any personal programming projects while working or my job will own whatever I do.
I don’t even plan to sell anything, I just want ownership of it so I can’t even fill my time with that.
hondaguy97386@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
That’s why you bring your own laptop. Never, and mean NEVER, do anything personal on a work computer.