Comment on You probably shouldn't trust the info anyway.

_bcron@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• nehal3m@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Kneecapped to uselessness. Are we really negating the efforts to stifle climate change with a technology that consumes monstrous amounts of energy only to lobotomize it right as it’s about to be useful? Humanity is functionally retarded at this point.

  source

  • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Do you think AI is supposed to be useful?!

    Its sole purpose is to generate wealth so that stock prices can go up next quarter.

    source

    • BossDj@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I WANT to believe:

      People are threatening lawsuits for every little thing that AI does, whittling it down to uselessness, until it dies and goes away along with all of its energy consumption.

      REALITY:

      Everyone is suing everything possible because $$$, whittling AI down to uselessness, until it sits in the corner providing nothing at all, while stealing and selling all the data it can, and consuming ever more power.

      source
    • servobobo@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Doesn’t even need to generate actual wealth, as speculation about future wealth is enough for the market.

      source

      • DrDickHandler@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Same thing.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    If you’re asking an LLM for advice, then you’re the exact reason they need to be taught to redirect people to actual experts.

    source

    • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Then they weren’t that useful to begin with.

      source

      • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Image for a second that I said you shouldn’t pull teeth with a wrench.

        Your response would’ve been equally appropriate.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I agree with the sentiment but as an autistic person I’d appreciate it if you didn’t use that word

    source

    • Kyatto@leminal.space ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I’ve seen a big uptick in that word usage, I don’t like seeing them and use a replacing extension to intercept and censor them to a more appropriate word, while showing an asterisk so I know it was censored. Now I don’t have to see the word, but I still get to see who is being a bigoted jerk.

      source
• cheddar@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Great advice. I always consult FDA before cooking rice.

  source

  • chaogomu@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    You may not, but the company that packaged the rice did. The cooking instructions on the side of the bag are straight from the FDA. Follow that recipe and you will have rice that is perfectly safe to eat, if slightly over cooked.

    source
• Affidavit@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Can’t help but notice that you’ve cropped out your prompt.

  Played around a bit, and it seems the only way to get a response like yours is to specifically ask for it.

  Honestly, I’m getting pretty sick of these low-effort misinformation posts about LLMs.

  LLMs aren’t perfect, but the amount of nonsensical trash ‘gotchas’ out there is really annoying.

  source

  • _bcron@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • Affidavit@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Here’s my first attempt at that prompt using OpenAI’s ChatGPT4. I tested the same prompt using other models as well, (e.g. Llama and Wizard), both gave legitimate responses in the first attempt. Image

      I get that it’s currently ‘in’ to dis AI, but frankly, it’s pretty disingenuous how every other post about AI I see is blatant misinformation.

      Does AI hallucinate? Hell yes. It makes up shit all the time. Are the responses overly cautious? I’d say they are, but nowhere near as much as people claim. LLMs can be a useful tool. Trusting them blindly would be foolish, but I sincerely doubt that the response you linked was unbiased, either by previous prompts or numerous attempts to ‘reroll’ the response until you got something you wanted to build your own narrative.

      source
    • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I love this lmao

      When chatgpt calls you the rizzler you know we living in the future

      source
    • Revan343@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      So do have like a mastodon where you post these? Because that’s hilarious

      source
  • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Especially since the stats saying that they’re wrong about 53% of the time are right there.

    source

    • grandkaiser@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      That’s right around 9% lower than the statistic that 62% of all statistics on the Internet are made up on the spot!

      source

      • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        I wish I had the source on hand, but you’ll just have to trust my word - after all, 47% of the time, it’s right 100% of the time!

        Joking aside, I do wish I had the link to the study as it was cited in an article from earlier this year about AI making stuff up even when it cited sources (literally lying about what was in the sources it claimed it got the info from) and how the companies behind these AI collectively shrugged their shoulders and said “there’s nothing we can do about it” when asked what they intend to do about these “hallucinations,” as they call them.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Image

  source
• iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Honestly? Good.

  source
• Kyatto@leminal.space ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Better chat models exist ^w^

  This one even provides sources to reference.

  Image

  source