hoshikarakitaridia
@hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
- Comment on Why do you care if a photo is AI or not? 1 day ago:
Maybe not the right discussion for the shit post community
- Comment on When a judge tells the jury to ‘forget XYZ,’ how can the jury possibly do that? 6 days ago:
First the direct answer: you can’t.
Some more context: there’s usually ways to deal with this issue. There’s voir dire for example, where you can do a practice run of the questions and answers for a specific witness, or the party can profer (idk if it’s spelled correctly) the testimony, giving the judge a general idea of the direct or cross-examination.
This usually only happens if something goes wrong. It can be things like the lawyer overstepping a boundary by accident, but it’s very frowned upon and they can be admonished and sanctioned by the judge.
For why to do about the “can’t put the shit back in the horse”, usually the judge gives the jury an admonishment and maybe even a curative instruction right before deliberation, but best case scenario it’s been handled in advance and doesn’t even happen.
- Comment on Anon meets a celebrity 1 week ago:
Soooo… Pics?
- Comment on Apple Airpod Subwoofer 2 weeks ago:
I make dubstep so I feel so this hurts my soul in a one two punch combo.
- Comment on Apple Airpod Subwoofer 2 weeks ago:
But imagine listening to dubstep though
- Comment on Wise words from the recently dead 2 weeks ago:
Yeah if you think life is simple just because you fit into that category, boy have I got some news for you. Never assume people’s struggles, the world is big and generalizing groups of people is dumb.
- Comment on In this family, we repress our feelings! 2 weeks ago:
Guess it takes a shit post to learn biology
- Comment on In this family, we repress our feelings! 2 weeks ago:
Sponge? Bacteria? Viruses?
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
That’s unrealistic. In the grant scheme of things Lemmy is small. There’s not enough activity for bigger criminal activity to occur here yet. Generally, there’s a bunch of three letter agencies who could probably get search warrants or permission to go after instance owners, but they’d need to be aware of Lemmy and they’d need a good enough reason to convince a judge. It’ll be a while until then. Maybe on mastodon first, we’ll see but that’s all speculation.
And should we be concerned? Maybe about those 3 letter agencies, but not about platforms like these, and most definitely not about Lemmy instances.
As long as we keep defederating from actually scary ones with csam on there, we’re more than good.
Also if this is a rhetoric question with a strong insinuation to get angry at lemmy.world then get bent, I like my Lemmy instances drama-free, thank you.
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
First of all, not a shit post.
People only hate the pedos they dislike.
Disagree. You mentioned MJ and Epstein. There is a huge amount of victims, witnesses, monetary transactions and evidence (e.g. pictures) about Epstein being a pedophile. For MJ being a pedophile there’s only a fraction of that.
I personally do not care for MJ. People like his music but I don’t really. It’s easier for me to see Epstein as a pedophile because there is just so much more corroborating evidence, and way harder to see MJ that way. Do I believe he’s not? Not really, I haven’t looked that deep into it and I heard this before a few times. But I’m not say someone is a pedophile without evidence. If they’re wrongly accused, that’s fucked up. And ultimately, he’s dead and there’s no real evidence and no suggestions he was part of a wider circle of other perpetrators.
On the other hand Epstein is dead, but there’s other people who helped him or committed crimes themselves. So we should concentrate on those, so that the victims get justice and the perpetrators which do still live get tried and convicted. And especially make sure ghislaine Maxwell, who is convicted and got an insane deal has to face more consequences and finally gives up names so we can start demanding trials for all of the others involved.
Basically, it’s never a “I hate Epstein but not MJ” thing, it’s just that we can address whatever Epstein did, and that is important and there’s lots to go on, but we kinda can’t do it with MJ unless there’s more evidence, there’s likely more perpetrators or there’s more victims coming forward, and I haven’t heard any of that.
- Comment on Sneacking a meme in before .world updates 1 month ago:
Nuzlocke tourism
- Comment on Inventive. I always give this guy a dollar 1 month ago:
I kinda want one now
- Comment on I can now save my game in Pokemon Yellow again after 25 years. 1 month ago:
You should be proud of yourself indeed
I’m an IT guy and I get mad anxiety with anything soldering, welding, …
I am incompatible with anything less digital than a PC so I got mad respect for this sorta stuff.
- Comment on Good luck figuring it out since it also doesn’t come with man pages 1 month ago:
Non-binary PC is just a quantum computer innit?
- Comment on Mitigating DRAM Refresh Latency via Hedged Request Strategies 1 month ago:
? That’s the video title and Laurie wired is pretty established, there’s no evidence of AI use.
- Comment on In this modern world of AI, with devices everywhere having microphones, is it even safe to satirically joke and banter with a friend anymore? 1 month ago:
Yes it is.
If it’s not, that has to do with you becoming an explicit target of 3-lettter agencies beforehand. Look, it’s legally risky and expensive to collect data from people, evaluate it and draw conclusions. You can become a big enough target for those agencies to reason that it’s worth it, but you gotta work really hard to get there.
In fact, the most likely thing for any given random person is either getting caught up in phishing attacks or getting chased by a PI at the mercy of family or a former partner that is holding grudges.
What I’m saying is yes, there’s a tiny chance that it’s not safe but if it really was dangerous for you to speak, you would probably already know.
Famously at Edward Snowden’s first interview the NSA was tapping him and he was chased around right up until they lost jurisdiction and so every TSA checkpoint became dangerous for him. But everyone who thinks they are just as endangered as Edward Snowden is most likely just paranoid.
- Comment on holy moley 1 month ago:
13 drive-by quick-access points
- Comment on Adobe modifies hosts file to detect whether Creative Cloud is installed 1 month ago:
Yeah from my intuition it sounds like this file serves as a makeshift firewall / proxy. Allowing software to override it kinda makes this weak and basically useless for a lot of purposes.
- Comment on Adobe modifies hosts file to detect whether Creative Cloud is installed 1 month ago:
Tbf it’s already write for admins only. But, if you completely remove write access that makes the file itself obsolete (there’s no use in a file that no one can edit) and if you restrict it to trusted installer / verified software, that’s not gonna eliminate Adobe.
- Comment on A shrubbery! 1 month ago:
Everyone in here talking about science and my stupid ass thought this was a reference to the song Scarborough fair
- Comment on It's important to remember that real art comes from people, not AI. 1 month ago:
I wish your opinion was shared more.
I do music production. I’ve seen what AI can do, and for making a simple master of one my demos AI is great. But everyone who has been there knows that the fun of making music comes from uniqueness. AI can’t do that, it can only riff on things known in its dataset.
I’m not worried at all, because this means the boring commercial music becomes less impressive, and unique and elaborate music becomes even more valuable. I’m cool with that; nothing of value is lost.
I get why people are freaked out, but most of the tangible issues come from greedy managers with a pinch of dunning-kruger, trying to replace workers. And that’s got almost nothing to do with AI and everything to do with assholes. There will be consequences, but people have to stick out this short-term chaos. And that’s the only thing I have empathy for in this.
Well that and unlicensed training because governments can’t get their shit together to enforce ethical guidelines for AI training & data collection practices.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
I love that one can identify you by how unhinged your posts are. Delightful - welcome back.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
“not nice” is doing some competition level heavy lifting. Getting barely enough food, just that little bit of hygiene, all your things in one bag, surrounded by helpless or crazy people and desperation so great you are constantly paranoid you might get abused or robbed. All of the safety and security you want a home for is hardly available in a homeless shelter.
It’s like saying being in prison is also living. Sure, on a technicality. But in real life no one would agree - prison makes people age faster for all the wrong reasons.
- Comment on What??? Nativity scene with a crucifix in the background? 2 months ago:
Pubic execution is a great way to refer to a sex change
- Comment on If I were to go out steal 34 cars. And charged with 34 felonies. One per each car. Could I not use the presidents case in defense of my own? Why or why not? 2 months ago:
If you mean the case where he raised presidential immunity against seditious conspiracy charges?
The reason he was granted this is because in his capacity of president, basically the courts are supposed to cut him some slack if he does some accidental criming; you see, if the president does it, it’s usually necessary to perform his duties and if you stop him you are preventing him from getting any work done. That’s basically what the supreme Court ruled. It’s a bit like when cops raise qualified immunity. It’s supposed to insulate them from personal grievances so they are able perform their duties. Only that the presidential immunity is way worse for us, because a cop can raise it and then prosecution has the burden to prove there was a rule and the cop knew it. But in this case it’s worse because the president just has to say it was in his presidential capacity and that’s it iirc.
So back to your question: can you do so too? No. You are not a president, you don’t have presidential immunity.
- Comment on Happy 17th of March 2 months ago:
Definitely over the threshold of slavery light with zero sugar
- Comment on Why is AI so bad at coming up with dialogue? 2 months ago:
Bunch of reasons, few people have pointed out in other comments already, including:
- text =/= dialogue
- LLMs train on the average guy, not good actors or only well done plays
- AI models are statistical approximations of patterns that emulate behavior of the real world. It’s gonna take shortcuts wherever it can
- maybe there’s specific tricks for positive or systems prompts that will improve quality in your case / on you model
- the model you are using could be bad for the task
- some of the points you are making strike me as personal preference; they could just as well apply to non-AI written series
Those are some things that play into why it feels like it’s awful at it. Some of it perception, some of it is true.
- Comment on Released footage of distribution sites run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation exposes the aid system designed by Israel in cooperation with the United States to humiliate Palestinians. 2 months ago:
Aaaand we got war crimes. Wonder what the UN will do with this.
- Comment on Men wanna be me, women wanna be with me. 2 months ago:
Something about your apostrophe placement and abbreviation really pisses me off
- Comment on The rising cost of dissent in America 2 months ago:
Brave guy and very interesting talk.
Can’t say I totally agree with him but using the laws of supply and demand on criticism and political dissent is really outside of the box thinking and it’s a good idea.