Comment on Front and Backflipping

saltesc@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I did a search and got a similar result:

  Image

  source

  • dingus@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Tbh I always assumed these AI search results posts were fake. I did the search and got the same weird result from TikTok highlighted at the top.

    source

    • sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Google really should remove this “feature”

      source
    • hex@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This is a different one. The tiktok one is just ripping the text from tiktok, and google has had this feature for yeaaaars. It’s just embedding the content on the page.

      The one from the OP is real too and that’s using this feature called “SearchLabs AI” which is written by AI

      source
  • saltesc@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Welp, that’s enough for me to assume 80% of these be real lol. Now I feel like I’m missing out, but I don’t think I am.

    source
  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I got exactly the same thing.

    AI has no concept of satire, which in my view is a good thing, as it makes people question just how accurate the information being provided really is.

    source

    • merc@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      AI has no concept.

      LLMs are nothing more than “spicy autocomplete”.

      source
• BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It’s realImage

  source
• morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  We’re in the shitpost community, even if it’s fake it’s still funny

  source

  • sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Sadly it’s not fake. Just go do the search on google:

    Image

    source

    • hex@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This is not the AI result, just an embed from a tiktok post.

      source
• Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Assuming AI Overview does not cache results, they would be generated at search-time for each user and “search-event” independently. Even recreating the same prompt would not guarantee a similar AI Overview, so there’s no way to confirm.

  source

  • snooggums@midwest.social ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Multiple people in this thread, including myself, have the exact same tiktok meme quote as results for that prompt.

    “AI summary” or whatever this is called is not the same as randomized image generation.

    source

    • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      My bad, I wasn’t precise enough with what I wanted to say. Of course you can confirm (with astronomically high likelihood) that a screenshot of AI Overview is genuine if you get the same result with the same prompt.

      What you can’t really do is prove the negative. If someone gets an output then replicating their prompt won’t necessarily give you the same output, for a multitude of reasons. e.g. it might take all other things Google knows about you into account, Google might have tweaked something in the last few minutes, the stochasticity of the model is leading to a different output, etc.

      Also funny you bring up image generation, where this actually works too in some cases. For example they used the same prompt with multiple different seeds and if there’s a cluster of very similar output images, you can surmise that an image looking very close to that was in the training set.

      source
  • saltesc@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I do that with LLM a fair bit. If just using GPTs website for something that should be simple, I often prompt the same thing several times and choose the best interaction as a base.

    source
  • snooggums@midwest.social ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The best tools are inconsistent!

    source