The only hobbies I actually enjoy require space: gardening and lapidary “arts” (gem/stone cutting). I can’t buy equipment because I don’t have the space to store them and having to move every 2-3 years is not only very difficult when you have more stuff but also really damn expensive.
So there’s that, and there’s retirement. Having set expenses (aside from taxes) is super important and you’ll never have that with renting when you’re retired.
Then again who am I kidding, I’m 38 and working in a factory. My retirement will be whenever I decide to buy a gun lol
Phegan@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Property ownership is the clearest path for generational wealth. It may suck to own, but you are building an asset and you can hand it off to future generations to have a head start with.
It’s a broken system, I am not advocating for it as a good system, but it’s the primary reason to own a home.
eager_eagle@lemmy.world 5 months ago
the thing is - there’s a lot of variables that shift the balance towards renting when looking within a time frame, even from a financial perspective.
blackstampede@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
You’re missing a few advantages to owning-
TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 5 months ago
you can rent and have a garden and rent is cheaper than a mortgage in a comparable area.
when people buy they often have to move further out to a cheaper area to get a mortgage
eager_eagle@lemmy.world 5 months ago
I’m missing all advantages of owning (or renting), that was not the intent.
dingus@lemmy.world 5 months ago
What if you’re not going to have a next generation? Is there still a good reason to own?
Phegan@lemmy.world 5 months ago
It’s still the most effective way to accumulate wealth within a single generation, so it can be an asset to use for retirement.
Again, not advocating for the system, I think property ownership is problematic, but I am explaining why it can be beneficial within the current system