Comment on 1919 (correctly)

stupidcasey@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• jballs@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It’s weird but at one point in the last 10 years, society just decided that everyone uses vibrate now.

  source

  • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Not boomers, they love the constant dings and obnoxious ringtones to be as loud as possible.

    source

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      don’t forget the type sounds

      source

      • SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Let’s be honest with this one. Most are probably just too lazy or inept feeling to figure out how to turn them off for themselves. The phone companies seems to have their software install with max volume and haptics turned on by default.

        source
      • Sprinks@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        …and the call back ring tones. For about 5 years i hated calling one person in particular because id have to listen to Hey, Soul Sister every…fricken…time.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I’m not a boomer but do love when my wife calls and everyone gets to hear the ever-classic ‘Helo Moto’ ringtone.

      source
    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      My dad’s ringtone is a motorcycle engine revving at max volume, and he never silences it. He also just lets it ring when he doesn’t want to answer.

      source
  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    We decided that ringtone were bullshit exactly when we had the option to have any sound imaginable for free.

    Before that…

    source
  • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    that works great if you keep your phone in your pocket. if you don’t…

    source

    • echodot@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Women in my experience point blank refused to keep their phones in their pocket and instead put it in the purse along with everything else so whenever it rings (assuming they even hear it in there) it’s always a mad dash to get it out before the person on the other end dies of old age.

      source

      • Eq0@literature.cafe ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I’ll apologize first: Sorry, kind internet stranger, you walked right in one of my pet peeves. (Now I feel morally justified in starting my rant with a level of emotional involvement that is totally and admittedly unjustified)

        WOMEN’S POCKETS ARE A F****ING JOKE! Have you ever tried putting anything more that the glimmering sparkle of a summer night in a woman pants pocket? It either falls right off or tries to stab the kidney once the poor girl sits down. Usually both.

        Because pants need to be stupidly skinny and form fitting, not made for comfort or for carrying anything!

        My toddler’s pockets (2 years old) are bigger than mine!

        /end rant, feel free to ring me up for extra rants on the subject

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Bysmuth@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I feel like i’ve become highly attuned to the sound of a phone and can hear it anywhere in a room. The disadvantage is of course a lingering stress whenever i get confused with a similar sound or someone elses phone

      source
• MissJinx@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  old.people… always old people

  source

  • protist@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I’m also 43, and I and many of my friends call each other all the time

    source

    • stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      33 and I’ve started calling people. It’s nice to just chat with friends and family

      source

      • teuniac_@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I’m 30, same. It’s also much faster to arrange something.

        source
  • Bluewing@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I absolutely hate text messages. I refuse to spend hours of my time sending text messages back and forth to solve a problem that a 60 second phone call could have disposed of.

    source

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      and I refuse to spend hours of my time listening to voicemails when I could have scanned a text message in 15 seconds

      source

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        This is why you actually answer the phone to prevent 300 voicemails. That’s on you if that happens. And I have repeatedly found that a one or two line text message NEVER conveys the whole message because people do not know how to create a cognizant thought. So I can either spend hours texting back and forth to get the whole picture or you can call me directly, answer my pointed questions, and be done in 60 seconds or less.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • jj4211@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      It really depends case by case.

      If back and forth starts going, then it’s time for a call.

      However text first to establish:

      • Is it shorter to take care of in text. Particularly if one party of the conversation tends to be needlessly verbose, text can be a godsend to let you skim their BS and cut to the chase.
      • If there has to be a conversation, when would be a good time.

      source
    • MissJinx@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Oh I would 100% exchange texts for 3 and a half days instead of just calling. So much energy to call someone

      source
• peoplebeproblems@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  And if they do call and it’s an emergency they’ll leave a message anyway

  source

  • Demdaru@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    They’ll call twice.

    Calling me twice in a row without good reason guarantees war, because I assume you’re literally dying.

    source
  • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Hopefully it’s not an actual emergency that requires immediate answer

    source

    • jj4211@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      If it’s an actual emergency, call 911.

      If it doesn’t need 911, society needs to accept that people are sometimes just not immediately available and be accommodating.

      I will answer my phone if one of a handful of people call me if at all possible, but sometimes it just isn’t in the cards. It’s convenient to take care of seemingly urgent matters that way, but it’s not the end of the world if it has to wait a bit for someone to be actually available.

      The world survived for centuries without the ability to immediately get a hold of everyone at a moment’s notice.

      source

      • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Sucks if someone needs some urgent info from you, like a blood type or whatever for emergency contact reasons and they could have it, but you don’t like to answer the phone.

        Nobody was saying you have to always immediately answer your phone. Just that there’s situations where a phone call is better than sending a text.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I always do. How could I hear it otherwise ?

  source

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Image

    source