Demdaru
@Demdaru@lemmy.world
- Comment on Oh no 1 week ago:
Jump forward like you would like to do the jump to roll thingie. Now, he didn’t outreach his hands, so that means that just after photo was taken, dude perfectly bodyslammed the camera xD
- Comment on There are Minimum Wages, Why Not a Maximum Wage? 2 weeks ago:
Welcome to yet another world war I guess?
- Comment on Anon reads a book for school 4 weeks ago:
I remember my teacher being upset about “official” interpretation. She called it out as over the top IIRC and then still taught it to us, because it was required on exams.
- Comment on Fruit Flies 4 weeks ago:
Better yet, they aren’t actually penguins - they were just called that because they resembled real penguins.
Which are literally dead today, because they dared live close to humans.
- Comment on Bandai Namco reportedly tries to bore staff into quitting, skirting Japan’s labor laws 4 weeks ago:
And company has cameras. Where I live, most monitor workers 24/7. So they would that especially while trying to get rid of you.
Of course, they say it’s for security and that’s what you sign for, so they can’t simply grab screen of you on phone and throw you out…however, suddenly management gets super instinct.
- Comment on Seattle is like "come to downtown please" 4 weeks ago:
Isn’t 60% of USA riding SUVs? Physics point kinda moot.
- Comment on Anon watches a movie with a girl 4 weeks ago:
…yeaaaah… that’s worse than original. “Nah, sorry, got brainlocked cuz damn you’re beautiful”.
Make it informal, silly and goof off of your own reaction to remove the awkward and embrace the “you’ll make fun of me for this later”.
- Comment on Piss™ 4 weeks ago:
How did it go? If gatorade was salty, you needed it, else you got fooled?
- Comment on Anon lives in the midwest 5 weeks ago:
Old worlder here. Still calling them Indians. Also actively refusing to use the term towards people of India, bexause we have other words for them (actually two, one similiar to Indian, secons not at all, neither a slur).
- Comment on Wolfenstein difficulty settings 1 month ago:
I love it so muuch, loved the original one too. Sad that remake got hate for that and thus, there’s little to no chance of it hapoening again…
- Comment on Just a reminder... 1 month ago:
Saw similiar shit here. “Delivery person needed!”. And whne it comes to pay, it’s sudden;y “up to xx/h”. God forbit they pay you normally.
- Comment on Choosing violence 1 month ago:
As a windows user WIN+R -> CMD -> TASKKILL /F /T /IM “<appname>*”
… I use it too much. Appa often block my screen :|
- Comment on Who says OSHA compliance doesn't have to be fun? 2 months ago:
Whaaaa, noooo. Belt off, helmet’s for pussies, gas is meant to be floored, and ppl need to feck off. /s
Although I do drift with forklift irl…
- Comment on How to treat a man 2 months ago:
Meanwhile men don’t have access to support groups, are not supported by anyone when they admit it, get straight up ridiculed for this ever happenning by both everyday people and justice system…
It happens to both genders. But we managed to build fundamental lattice of support for one of them (fundamental as in there’s still so much to do), while failing to even recognize the other one faces this problem too. We do not have to compromise on helping one side to help the other - that’s straight up not an option. But we should help, and recognize the need of help, for both.
- Comment on Oregonian driving 3 months ago:
The gas is meant to hug the floor tightly, engine is meant to roar, adrenaline to be pumped, and zoomies to be upheld.
…in a race. However, zoomies apply everywhere.
- Comment on Windows 11 3 months ago:
I…what? Never said 7 was better than 10, nor that quality goes up. Just that every second windows is good.
- Comment on Windows 11 3 months ago:
Every second windows tho. Xp good, Vista bad, 7 good, 8 bad, 10 good, 11 bad…
- Comment on Povertymaxxed and bolognapilled 3 months ago:
Reminds me when I got off diet. I was so desoerate that I took a whole ass bread, cut it horizontally, put a lot of veggies and meat inside and ate it in one go.
God it felt good.
God my stomach hurt.
- Comment on gotdamn 4 months ago:
The only “unneeded” abortions are those that are forced on the mother against her will.
Abortion is killing off another human being, so it’s not really that black and white. Also, I agree that forced abortions are, at the very least, unneeded.
The only “help” our hypothetical victim has requested is an abortion, and she hasn’t requested it from you.
What I meant by help is therapy, societal support and the like. If we just presume that every woman wanting abortion is a rape victim, these forms of help would loose support due to lessening the weight of situation.
Why are you choosing to involve yourself?
The only place I chose to involve myself initially was in calling a human being brought into this world through people knowing what they are doing a parasite.
I’ll stop you right there.
It was you who wanted to kniw my rationale. I simply responded.
As our situation does not involve anyone accused of a criminal act, there is no valid justification to presume consent.
Meanwhile, however, you require others to presume that there’s a rape victim. This means there’s criminal act, and thus is a valid justification.
If your personal code of morality only allows you to accept abortion in the case of non-consent, you may presume non-consent. You can satisfy your own morality by accepting the possibility that she was raped, and just doesn’t want to talk about it. You can simply presume she meets your arbitrary criteria; you have no need to actually prove her status to any degree of certainty.
I’ll be honest, only at this point I actually got what you are going for, but sadly, it applies both ways and depends highly on someones morality. While I cannot say in good faith that I would choose life of an unborn baby over it’s mothers health - be it mental or physical - there are people whose moral compas wouldn’t allow to simply accept killing off such child. There are also more reasonable - in ny opinion - people who simply don’t want us to kill off unborns due to the mere convienience.
My point from the get go was, however, to not treat creating a new living being from activity meant for doing just that as a surpise and/or punishment. For people to think about what they are doing, and what consequences may be.
- Comment on gotdamn 4 months ago:
About presuming she met any criteria: If our aim is to limit unneeded abortions, then this approach is not only invalid, but also damaging. It will work against the target of removing casual abortions while also removing a lot of weight behind act of rape. The second part is dangerous because it could lessen actual amount of help for victims. Also, this means that woman would have to prove she’s a victim - by gaining second opinion, most probably with the help of police, maybe could be done by medical specialist. I’d honestly rather lean onto the other, to remove need for criminal investigation if such is unwanted by victim.
About last point: I choose to presume consent because great majority of children is conceived consensually, and as such this is default, and I’d treat a rape victim as a rape victim, not much to say about that one. Case by case.
- Comment on gotdamn 4 months ago:
-
I didn’t aim to proclaim “women need to admit to rape to get healthcare”. I countered instead calling fetus a rapist - an actively and wholly out of control of a woman agressor. No, unethical situations aside, both parties knew what consequences are there. No use getting pissed at someone/thing because of your own stupidity.
-
I put rape aside because it wasn’t aimed at discussing this part in depth but…if you want, why not. First of all, women, as you wrote, are not obligated to admit to being a victim of rape. And yes, in the way I described it above, it’s suggested that rape victims are entitled to abortion. However, the mental jump to then switching the logic around that any woman looking for abortion was raped is simply illogical in the same manner that saying only alcoholics buy alcohol is. In the dystopian version of the world where abortion is fully illegal except for unexpected and unethical situations like rape, I think that yes, women would have to admit to being a victim to receive medical help. There’s simply hardly any other way.
-
- Comment on gotdamn 4 months ago:
Nope, a science project apparently, was it not?
- Comment on New Crazy Taxi title will be an open-world, massively multiplayer AAA game, according to Sega 4 months ago:
You can now get the experience of being aggresively tailed in a game too!
- Comment on gotdamn 4 months ago:
I slightly do troll - in a sense of presenting fully opposite view to the one provided.
And the"rape aside" is meant to do the heavy lifting. It’s there as a heavy notion that shit happens. Forced sex, rapid health declination, getting too drunk to think logicaly (…although from what I know, then it’s also rape, no? Or I misunderstood), or simply finding out your body can’t handle birth. These are all valid reasons for abortion.
But by all means, consequence of sex is having a child, and people - this is my own fully subjective opinion - seem to be bewildered by this notion. By all means, people always should take into account that sex ends with children without precautions, and still may end with children with, and be responsible about it. Not call a consequence of their actions a parasite.
- Comment on gotdamn 4 months ago:
I love that bait, hahah. Rape aside, woman had to take into account possibility of a child when she had sex. Same with her partner. Sorry, but that’s the biological reason sex even exists, and denying it because we found good methods of contraception does nothing because even these methods are being advertised as not 100% effective.
- Comment on Thanks 4 months ago:
Europe. Busses in my town have a clause that they arrive within +/-2 minutes of schedule.
However, to correct for this bestial treatment of driver rights to piss on people, sometimes the bus doesn’t show at all.
- Comment on SPLORP! 5 months ago:
I may mistake it with something but basically, it can trap you underwater. It’s muddy so you can get stuck and…well. Recall the part where they stand on slowly sinking part.
- Comment on Seems awfully dangerous 5 months ago:
Fits with what the u/UnPassive wrote. Still terrible. And yeah, where I live we have quite good public transport, even if folk here tend to think it’s not good enough. But overall where I live people seem to be more focused, maybe because a lot of them likes to speed a little bit too much, and that requires focus. Our traffic isn’t that congested.
- Comment on Seems awfully dangerous 5 months ago:
Gimmie a sec to grab my jaw from the floor. Yeah if I ever end in the USA I’m gonna make sure to avoid getting on two wheels. Where I live there is some hatred between bikers and drivers (two way), but not that point.
- Comment on Seems awfully dangerous 5 months ago:
Bloody hell people here present driving motorcycle or even bicycle as a big survival thingy. Wtf.
Never once feared for my life on bicycle. On the road never heard or saw about motorcycle crashes other than these where the motorcyclist lost control or did something stupid. Hell, people recommend getting motorcycle.
Now, this may be regional thing but in this case, how the hell is, let’s assume, USA so bad with driving if most ya all spend most of your life driving?