such as yourself you mean?
Comment on monthly challenge
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 day ago
People don’t know how to use greater-than or less-than symbols
mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 4 hours ago
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Nope, it’s wrong lol
bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 16 hours ago
It’s correctly used in the text.
Number of steps < 500 is equivalent to 500 > number of steps.
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 15 hours ago
I was thinking that. Seems to work to me, the wide end is the bigger number and 500 is more than your steps per day
gerryflap@feddit.nl 16 hours ago
It’s a bit weird, but imo not wrong. 500 > steps/day or steps/day < 500 is the same. As long as the big end of the < or > is at the 500 it makes sense. It only doesn’t make sense if you literally read 500 > steps/day as “five hundred greater than steps a day” instead of parsing it as math.
selokichtli@lemmy.ml 23 hours ago
They where busy… walking?
na_th_an@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
If you read it aloud it doesn’t sound right, but from a mathematical perspective it’s saying the number of steps per day should be less than 500, which I think is the intention of the writer, no?
BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Yes that’s the intention but they got the order wrong, it would make more sense if it was written as number of steps < 500
Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
It’s so wrong it underflowed into somehow being right again.
Unusual? Sure. Mathematically? Right.
xavier666@lemmy.umucat.day 19 hours ago
x>5 <=> 5>x 🤓
Lemminary@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Can’t tell if an Excel enthusiast or a palindrome aficionado. 🤔
higgsboson@piefed.social 4 hours ago
Yes
violetsoftness@piefed.blahaj.zone 22 hours ago
People don't know how to use greater-than or less-than symbols