Electricd
@Electricd@lemmybefree.net
- Comment on I Got This Right, Right? 3 days ago:
This means that liking trans women doesn’t automatically mean you’re attracted to men, so calling it gay is an oversimplification of how attraction works.
I get it. Calling it hetero would seem like an oversimplification as well though. We need more words!
Attraction isn’t really exclusively based on sex, though
I get it, but making it solely based on gender isn’t a good idea as well I believe. Doesn’t seem specific enough. Also, trans women and trans men don’t necessarily change physically, right? They can still look like their birth gender, that’s what’s throwing me off I believe.
- Comment on I Got This Right, Right? 3 days ago:
oh sure, I’m not talking about this case obviously
I was thinking about things like epstein files not being made public and left accusing right, and right accusing left
Mass surveillance, facism, war… that happened under obama now happens with trump
Don’t have examples on left blaming right when it happens though, I was mainly saying that each side will blame the other for things they have done too, but obviously I missed the point of this post because that’s clearly not it
after re-reading it I feel dumb, I’ll strike the text. Sorry.
- Comment on I Got This Right, Right? 4 days ago:
After a bit of research, it seems like it aims towards being based on gender and not sex, hmm
I believe I might think it’s about sex because I wouldn’t be interested in a non cisgender person, but that might only be me? I had the feeling that most heterosexual people would not be interested in trans people
- Comment on I Got This Right, Right? 4 days ago:
According to you, homosexuality is only about gender, not sex. This isn’t right and there is no consensus as far as I know. I would personally say a cis guy dating a trans woman is gay
gender and sex are not the same, for the 100th time
You’re the one inventing misgendering here
- Comment on I Got This Right, Right? 4 days ago:
Everyone spreads misinformation to further their goals. It’s just not so obvious when it’s your side doing it. Confirmation bias
- Comment on I Got This Right, Right? 4 days ago:
The funny thing is you can rotate things around “right” -> “left” and it will still be valid
- Comment on Foolproof advice 1 week ago:
A bit of sexism, wouldn’t be funny otherwise, right?
- Comment on Step 1: Delete 2 weeks ago:
It’s perfect
- Comment on Who is the enemy? 3 weeks ago:
Alright, I just use my finger along with water and soap to remove it and it does the trick
- Comment on Who is the enemy? 3 weeks ago:
UTC
But dealing with timezone conversions and daylight savings is a pain. Like if you make a recurring task every day BASED on the user’s timezone, it’s annoying
- Comment on Who is the enemy? 3 weeks ago:
Or by people that make the difference between pedophiles and pedocriminals
- Comment on Who is the enemy? 3 weeks ago:
Nvidia hates people but lives because of them
- Comment on Who is the enemy? 3 weeks ago:
Damn, you created a doubt in me
Would all of this be a giant lie? AM I THE PRODUCT? (always was)
- Comment on Who is the enemy? 3 weeks ago:
How do people use them else though?
- Comment on Who is the enemy? 3 weeks ago:
From Wikipedia
Psychologists, however, have found that there is no strong evidence for effects on human behavior around the time of a full moon.[12]
- “Full Moon Effect On Behavior Minimal, Studies Say”. National Geographic News. 6 February 2004. Archived from the original on 24 July 2017. Retrieved 3 December 2005.
TL;DR: Overall, studies show different answers, which could be the cause of:
- Unrelated, manually picked data from some area
- Small sample size
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_moon#cite_ref-12 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_effect
Probably a case of: only people that experience out of the ordinary rates around those periods or days will speak up about it due to the phenomenon having some popularity, while others forget or don’t talk about it.
- Comment on Who is the enemy? 3 weeks ago:
Pretty much everyone then
- Comment on Who is the enemy? 3 weeks ago:
Every dev hates time zones
- Comment on 2hot2handle 3 weeks ago:
The original definition and ideology of feminism is reaching gender equality in a society that favors men
I’m just basing myself on this definition
Feminists rarely if ever disown them.
I haven’t seen many people talk about them indeed. Maybe because the misandrists are the one who speak the loudest
- Comment on Steam: Updates to User Review Scores Based on Language 3 weeks ago:
if you don’t participate a lot, or don’t have potentially controversial opinions, it won’t happen as much and won’t be noticeable
- Comment on Steam: Updates to User Review Scores Based on Language 3 weeks ago:
Sadly, indeed
People paying everything by card won’t be interested anyways, and that’s a LOT of people
I’ve heard that in countries with bad economy there’s still some usage, but nothing incredible
I’ve met people who are in those types of countries and they told me they mainly hold crypto to avoid the enormous inflation of their currency, and pay with it or exchange when they want to spend it. Basically an alternative to exchanging fiat to another fiat
- Comment on 2hot2handle 3 weeks ago:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ne_supra_crepidam
Would Latin work?
- Comment on 2hot2handle 3 weeks ago:
You got me in the first part
I hope this is sarcasm though
- Comment on 2hot2handle 3 weeks ago:
that’s mensplaining /s
- Comment on 2hot2handle 3 weeks ago:
So you prefer defaming people just in case? I’m sorry but that’s dumb.
At this point most people explaining things to others, assuming they’re not knowledgeable, can be called racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic…
- Comment on 2hot2handle 3 weeks ago:
Both exist and are a problem.
- Comment on 2hot2handle 3 weeks ago:
Funnily enough, assuming men are likely to be sexist is sexist
- Comment on 2hot2handle 3 weeks ago:
through the assumption that you, a man, knows better than her
And what’s the evidence that this happened here? You just assumed he was sexist.
- Comment on 2hot2handle 3 weeks ago:
The very definition says the opposite. But even if it was the case, it should NOT be used like this becaue it is specifically targeting men, which would be sexist. Being the very thing it meant to destroy.
- Comment on 2hot2handle 3 weeks ago:
Violent and strict feminists are probably feminist if they seek equality. I don’t think it’s a good position to be in, but that’s it
There is a popular trend of “all men”, or “the world would be better without men”, this is not feminism, and that’s the definition of “extreme feminism” for me. Misandry is extreme feminism. These people can go fuck themselves. They’re enemies of feminism.
Hating others is easy. There’s a lot of xenophoby, homophoby, transphoby, sexism. We don’t need more from the marginalized people themselves.
- Comment on 2hot2handle 3 weeks ago:
When were you defending me?
Just by upvoting, I meant
Is extreme feminism not considered feminism in your mind?
No. Feminism is wanting to reach equality and stop discrimination between sex/genders. Extreme feminism is wanting women superiority, or attacking men to improve women’s situation