Not really, it just has to work on a few people.
With how cheap online ads are, if just 1% of people are stupid enough to act based on ads, it makes them worth it.
Comment on Why advertise on YouTube?
Telodzrum@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Because adverting works, yes even on you.
dakar@kbin.social 2 years ago
Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Not on me, I shoved an Uno-Reverse Card up my Nose and now the Ads think about me.
KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Life Pro Tip: You’re immune to advertizing if you can literally only afford rent nd store-brand groceries.
Luke_Fartnocker@lemm.ee 2 years ago
I’m not immune to advertising. I make a point to never purchase anything I’ve ever seen advertised. If you spend 30 seconds telling me about your product before I watch a 1 minute clip that I will probably regret watching anyway, then I will make a point to never buy anything from your company.
meco03211@lemmy.world 2 years ago
I hate this line of reasoning. I hate what advertising has become. Whatever advertising gimmicks might work on me, way more is wasted on gimmicks that at best I ignore, and at worst actively deter me from purchasing whatever they’re selling. I’m a net negative as far as advertising is concerned.
Telodzrum@lemmy.world 2 years ago
No, you’re not special. Advertising works on you.
meco03211@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Hence why I said whatever advertising does work on me, it’s overshadowed by how much advertising is wasted on me. I’m a net negative in the system.
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 years ago
You’re also a drop in the bucket.
kaffeeringe@feddit.de 2 years ago
Yes, I hate every single brand that interupts my gardening videos.
BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 years ago
That may be true, but for every you (and me) that are deterred by some ads rather than inspired, there are more others. If it’s didn’t work, companies wouldn’t spend the money.
meco03211@lemmy.world 2 years ago
And I think that’s some of the issue that has grew to an uncontrollable mess. Advertising companies only care about getting ads in front of the most eyes. Sure some try to target specific audiences, but the terrible and predatory practices have led someone like me to actively avoid any messaging from ads. I’d hazard a guess that trying to limit advertising to people like me, might actually have a positive effect on advertising as a whole. Less wasted resources on such a disenfranchised segment that will not buy what they’re selling.
kaffeeringe@feddit.de 2 years ago
I think ads could work better if YouTube didn’t use them to make the free experience awful. They usually have neither to do with me nor with the content I tried to watch.
Khrux@ttrpg.network 2 years ago
The thing is, it’s quite easy for a marketing department to measure their success. They release an annoying unskippable YouTube and and change nothing else in their marketing and their profits go up by 1% or whatever. As much as I basically do no shopping where the day to day advertising I see can influence it, that’s a pretty abnormal lifestyle pattern. Plus I’m still susceptible to choosing specific items inside a shop, and I definitely susceptible when I’m looking for specific products and come across secret ads disguised as advice.
Krudler@lemmy.world 2 years ago
The beer Carling Black Label was specifically NOT advertised because It was determined that’s what drew the customers to the product
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 2 years ago
You know how there’s often three sizes of something, say coffee, for example. Small, medium and large. Alternatively it could also be three price tiers; iPhone cheap, iPhone normal and iPhone expensive. Well more often than not the most expensive one is there so that people can go like: “$1499 for a phone?!? Absolutely not, I’ll go with the more affordable $999” version" - just like Apple wanted you to.
Customer behaviour is among the most studied psychological phenomenoms out there. No matter how stupid you think some ad is, it still works. It might not make a noticeable difference on individual level, but when you show an advertisement to million people, then it starts showing effect.
meco03211@lemmy.world 2 years ago
But what you described isn’t really an advertising gimmick. I’m aware of the pricing gimmick but how will I know what price an iPhone is of I never absorb an ad? In fact I almost ditched samsung last time I bought a phone (due to their bullshit bloatware which I consider an extension of advertising). It was only because it was the cheapest that I got another one. Advertising didn’t positively affect my choice in any way.
kaffeeringe@feddit.de 2 years ago
I wish I could tell YouTube, I can’t buy a car or sell a house, I’m not interested in football an I don’t wear make up or womens’ underwear.
algorithmae@lemmy.one 2 years ago
Boy do I have good news for you!
adssettings.google.com
Yawnder@lemmy.zip 2 years ago
Are you more likely to buy Cascade dishwasher soap, or that other random box of a name you’ve never heard of, for the same price?
That’s what I thought.
meco03211@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Wrong. Cheapest until there is a noticeable change in quality regardless of brand name. Nice try though.
Yawnder@lemmy.zip 2 years ago
Sure, sure.
OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 2 years ago
I’m not denying my own vulnerability to advertising, but that particular preference is based on my parents’ choices.
Yawnder@lemmy.zip 2 years ago
Hehehe. I do get that!
xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 2 years ago
I literally don’t care. I’ll just buy the cheapest one.
SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world 2 years ago
As the big brand one with all ads gives me rashes. I get the other one.