“The Gays™” generally gets the point across.
Comment on LGBTQIA++
Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org 11 months agoif the ‘+’ includes every not mentioned gender/sexuality anyways, why can’t we just say ‘L+’?
SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Stamets@startrek.website 11 months ago
Because then it doesn’t feel like equal representation for everyone. It feels like Lesbians are getting the most representation with everyone being an after thought. While lesbians are awesome, it does feel shitty for everyone else. That’s why so many additions have been made. It doesn’t feel representative of everyone or equal. Also why I throw the whole thing out and just call us all something else. No one gets specific representation but it goes back to the original meaning of the Pride flag. Every color in equal representation, showing the diversity of us all and how we all deserve to be seen and heard.
Katana314@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I get the criticism, but most countries are not in the term “The United Nations” either. It feels possible to make a grouped, organized label that supports minority sexuality groups and opposes bigotry.
Stamets@startrek.website 11 months ago
But most countries are not in the term “The United Nations” either
I mean… no country is in that term. That’s the point that I’m trying to make. If you have a name for a collection of individual groups then the collective name shouldn’t mention any one particular group.
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Naw, we just need to come up with words for different types of people that all start with L. Then we’ll be covered.
Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org 11 months ago
Also why I throw the whole thing out and just call us all something else.
true equality would either be just ‘+’, without any letters, or including every letter, which seems impossible.
or like you said, something completely else. I personally like [please don’t kill me] ‘alphabet people’. I understand that rightoids use this term as an insult so it isn’t usable, which is a shame, because apart from its negative connotation it has a few nice upsides:
- sexualities/genders are being abbreviated by single letters already and since the alphabet contains all letters, everyone is included
-‘people’ is completely neutral towards everyone as well
octoperson@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
Wouldn’t be the first time a term of abuse got appropriated by its target group
captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Because L+ is the only streaming service I’d pay for
Seriously though the history of lgbt as an acronym comes down to the fact that it began with gay men and lesbians organizing separately and bi and trans people being part of those organizations, but bisexual and trans groups began differentiating and separately organizing while we all began realizing we needed to work together more in order to actually change things.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 11 months ago
IT folks solved this ages ago.
{A-Z}+
1st@kbin.social 11 months ago
The second I have to use regular expressions I'm turning straight.
Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social 11 months ago
I think being fluent in regular expressions probably makes you involuntarily celebrate so orientation won't matter.
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
wouldn’t that match STRAIGHT ? 🤔