ToastedRavioli
@ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
Born to Squint, Forced to See ⚜️
- Comment on How soon do you get there? 1 day ago:
It would be most feasible to have like three high speed trains in the US. Up and down both coasts, and then east coast to west coast through the midwest, Denver, SLC etc.
That alone would be enough to replace a ton of car and plane trips, even if it didn’t provide service everywhere
- Comment on How soon do you get there? 1 day ago:
If, in this context, “sensible” means “smaller than half of Texas” maybe…
- Comment on How soon do you get there? 1 day ago:
If the two locations are close maybe, but most of the time I would say theyre not remotely as fast.
You can fly from New York to LA in 6 hours. On a train it would take like 3 days
- Comment on Anon is a doctor 2 days ago:
As Abraham Lincoln once said, “the doctor who prescribes shit to himself has a really cool guy for a patient”
- Comment on Total fabrication 3 days ago:
Microslop is pretty good at “fixing” shit that isnt broken
- Comment on Anon has a proposal for you 5 days ago:
Id be worried about the hunting knife more if he didnt have such tiny arms
- Comment on Anon is a victim 1 week ago:
Idk Providence can be a bit swampy
- Comment on After all, why not? 1 week ago:
Theres an alignment chart in here somewhere, and Im pretty sure Ive been in each section of it at some point
- Comment on Pornography showing strangulation and incest to be banned in UK from early November 3 weeks ago:
What are you doing step-strangler?!?
- Comment on As Jack Smith Testifies, a Senator’s Accusation of Perjury Falters 5 weeks ago:
As bad as Schmitt looks here, he’s actually infinitely worse. The guy has only ever “succeeded” at anything because he is a sycophantic zealot.
When he was the MO AG he literally did nothing of benefit for the people of the state whatsoever. He has continued to fail upwards courtesy of the R next to his name. Mitch McConnell could be a braindead head in a jar and Schmitt would still be the most useless republican senator by a country mile
- Comment on Oh-ho-ho 5 weeks ago:
What do we do when the moms clap?
We
clapbackshut the fuck up! - Comment on Some mums be like 5 weeks ago:
I dont think the problem comes from doing it with a baby, it comes from not stopping it after theyre old enough to talk themselves. Speaking in an infantilized way to a growing kid is a terrible idea.
At one of my jobs there is a customer with a 10 year old daughter that she talks to like a small child. Despite the kid being 10, she acts/talks like shes is still 6 or something. Its sad to see
- Comment on Exclusive: Clean tech startup Fluxnium found a way to tap 50,000 years' worth of nuclear fuel 1 month ago:
Its not “just bury it underground”. Thats extremely reductionist and makes it seem far less safe than it is.
The spent uranium is not a liquid or a loose green sludge. It consists of solid, durable ceramic pellets that do not melt or dissolve easily in water. Those pellets are then sealed inside airtight tubes made of zirconium, which are then placed into massive canisters made of thick carbon steel and coated in copper. The canisters are engineered to withstand extreme pressures and resist rusting for hundreds of thousands of years.
Those canisters are then placed in underground tunnels and packed tightly with bentonite clay. If any moisture ever seeps into the tunnel, this clay absorbs it, swells up, and creates a waterproof seal that locks the canisters in place. But even then, the repository is built at least 500 meters (about 1,600 feet) underground inside exceptionally stable rock formations, such as solid granite or deep salt beds. These areas have virtually no water movement and have remained seismically quiet for millions of years
Its perfectly safe, and significantly more thought out than “just put it in the ground”
- Comment on Anon hates tiktok 1 month ago:
Well yeah, but they are based on the universe that was invented earlier. It would be pretty jarring for them to have made a change like that
- Comment on Anon hates tiktok 1 month ago:
I dont think that in the 60s-90s anyone would have necessarily anticipated the existence of smartphones as they are now. Rather than it being a “deliberate” choice not to have them in the show. Its just not a futuristic idea of communication that existed at the time. Theres not smartphones in The Jetsons either. Earlier ideas of what the future would be like were a lot more utopian than the dystopian hellscape induced by smartphones and social media
- Comment on 1 month ago:
Defamation requires some degree of lying to damage someones reputation, so this is not defamation.
Technically they suspended them for being elected and for the subsequent media interest, per their own words. Both of those things factually occurred
There is much that could be said about how fucked up that is, but it is also not defamation
- Comment on So are they like extinct or something? 1 month ago:
What is a rhombus but two triangles, my dear
- Comment on I'm not sure they will 2 months ago:
Fuckin homophoves, man
- Comment on I'm not sure they will 2 months ago:
LLMs are just a more complicated algorithm though. AI would be a pretty useful term so long as people are sure to make that distinction and only use AI to refer to a truly complex algorithm. Calling a thermostat algorithm on an A/C “AI” is definitely a meaningless use of the term
- Comment on I'm not sure they will 2 months ago:
Younger generations are, by and large, as technologically illiterate as boomers are. It doesnt apply to all of them, but the majority of them grew up with nothing but easy UIs. They may not chicken-pick to type, but they still cant troubleshoot anything and tend to know nothing outside of interacting with a typical interface. They definitely grew up with nothing like Windows 95 or 98 (or even XP) where you had to actually understand how a computer works to some extent to use the thing (or fix it)
- Comment on Texas Rejected an AI-Driven School’s Bid to Open a Charter. The State Still Approved It for the Voucher Program 2 months ago:
Over the last two years, officials in numerous states have questioned the model, characterizing it as “untested” and ”experimental.” In North Carolina, one charter school board member feared two hours was “not nearly enough” to teach required subjects. A month earlier, in August 2024, an official in Utah worried that the school’s instructors may act more like “a life coach” than a teacher
I agree with that assessment 100%, but it makes you question other things that get approved even though the same case applies. If were gonna apply that assessment to this kind of AI bullshit program, then the same standard should be held to all of the athletics-centered programs that are all over the place. There are tons of private programs where kids go to class for an hour and then participate in a sport for two hours and then back to class for an hour, etc. Hockey is especially rife with these kinds of programs because hockey kids tend to have money. Why is a school allowed to get any degree of public funding when half (or more) of the kid’s “education” is just playing a sport? Beyond public money, how is that considered an acceptable equivalent to an actual 8 hour a day public education?
They cant even make any argument that these kids are likely to be successful because of the sport. Odds are their academic skills will be too shitty to play for a college (if they are held to real standards), and the odds of them succeeding in athletics are slim to none considering how rare it is for someone to become a professional athlete. Sports based schools shouldn’t exist
- Comment on Rich ppl live longer 2 months ago:
I suppose thats kind of what I meant. For sure there are actual differences between a $30 bottle and an $80 bottle, but after $30 it is mostly a game of massively diminishing returns. A $60 bottle of wine is nowhere near as good of a value as two $30 bottles of wine. A $300 bottle is sure as shit nowhere near good enough to be better than the value of 10 $30 bottles
- Comment on Rich ppl live longer 2 months ago:
A good bottle of wine is only in the $20-$30 range. IMO, every wine I have ever had that costs more than $30 is not any better than wine that is $30. Ive tried quite a bit of different stuff up to $75-$300 bottles that I got for free. None of it was worth more than a $30 bottles, at least to my palette. The one exception probably being Veuve Cliquot champagne, which is really good but costs like $50.
There is a pretty big difference between a $7 bottle of wine and a $30 bottle of wine though. Honestly wine is kind of an acquired taste, and there are a lot of varieties. If you want something good but also cheap then you cant go wrong with a $10 bottle of sweet table wine. Any other kind of wine its worth it to spend for something in the $20-$30 price range
- Comment on Walmart actually teaches their employees how to get food stamps 2 months ago:
Im not victim blaming, Im saying the story doesnt add up. And no one is a victim of their own decision to work for Walmart, there are other places to work.
Personally I have worked for them on several occasions and they always paid above the average entry-level wage in the area, provided benefits beyond what is legally required (even for part time people, as I was), like PTO, and I never personally saw anyone get hour limited at 29 hours. That aspect doesnt even make sense either, as Im pretty certain the classification for full time hours is 32+, not 30.
Either way, Walmart isnt the devil incarnate that everyone claims it to be. I didnt leave because of mistreatment, I left because its a poorly run company that makes stupid decisions. Its not a perfect company, and sure they are intensely anti-union which is fucked. That said, Im pretty sure this story is fake ragebait, or at best the details have been highly edited to sound worse.
- Comment on Walmart actually teaches their employees how to get food stamps 2 months ago:
If she has a partner with an income then she isnt trying to afford $1400 rent on $1700 income
If she has a partner without an income, then the story is still sus af because no landlord would rent to someone for that far over 1/3rd of their income.
The math aint mathing. And $1400 is nothing in some places and is more than you need for a 2-3 bedroom house in others. Its all about location
- Comment on Walmart actually teaches their employees how to get food stamps 2 months ago:
I know we all love to bash Walmart, but it makes no sense that someone who earns $1700 a month after tax could qualify to rent a $1400 a month apartment. No landlord would reasonably do that, so this story is fishy at best already
Even if true, thats kind of the fault of the person who decided to spend 4/5ths of their income on rent rather than get a roommate or rent something cheaper
- Comment on In-between 2 months ago:
Kidnap the santi claus, put him in a bag
- Comment on Anon has a paranormal experience 2 months ago:
He/him/hisssss
- Comment on On fire 2 months ago:
Technically the bombardier beetle does not bite nor sting. Instead it shoots hydrogen peroxide and hydroquinone in two different streams, which when reacted together pretty much instantly reach 212°f and chemically burn whatever they are shooting at
- Comment on It’s That Easy [Tommy Siegel] 2 months ago:
They really did though. As someone who prefers wearing shorts at the knee or below, I literally cannot find shorts anymore when I go shop. Every single pair of shorts in my waist size is so damn short they would be halfway up my thigh.
When the hell did male booty shorts become a thing? Bring me back to the mid 2000s era of baggy shorts that are three inches below the knee before you make me wear a pair of booty shorts. For fucks sake