i know this meme is quite old but i still don’t agree with it. sex is not about [what other people call “sexual intercourse”]. instead it’s about having a pretense to meet other people. i believe that the underlying dynamic that moves you to go to parties and meet other people is mostly sexual. i.e. you wouldn’t go out so much just to make platonic acquaintances. but once that you’re out, you also talk to other people! which brings communication into society.
How do students who are always involved in mathematics and physics get to know about sex?
Submitted 1 day ago by genfood@feddit.org to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://feddit.org/pictrs/image/091aa621-e655-4d35-a195-a54f319d47f1.jpeg
Comments
gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 2 hours ago
Etterra@discuss.online 13 hours ago
Porn on the internet, just like everybody else.
ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 1 day ago
Fun fact: Will I. Fuck is actually the maternal grandfather of Black Eyed Peas member Will I. Am, by way of his mother, Anita Good Fuck
bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 19 hours ago
If I’m reading this correctly, then an orgy isn’t an orgy if there is at least one person not fucking. This means that a single camera person not getting any turns what could be an orgy into just a set of sets of people fucking.
Ajen@sh.itjust.works 16 hours ago
No, it just means that the camera person doesn’t belong to the subset of H that makes up the orgy.
farmgineer@nord.pub 1 day ago
I really need to refresh my set theory symbols. I haven’t taken that class in… oh no… Almost 30 years
TwilightKiddy@programming.dev 30 minutes ago
∪ is for “union”, aka “disjunction for sets”, ∈ is for “includes”, ⊂is for “subset”, don’t confuse ⊂ with ⊆, which also allows for both operands to be the same set.
Difference between ∈ and ⊂ is that former takes an element and a set as operands, latter takes two sets.
bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
I understand at least 20% of text, upvote. This is how much obscurity tolerance is needed to enjoy memes over here.
Elting@piefed.social 1 day ago
Doesn’t matter, read fuck.
PlexSheep@infosec.pub 1 day ago
I don’t like how the pairs $(h, h^‘)$ are implicitly the same as $(h^’, h)$. I think the post confuses the pairs with small sets. Normally, order matters in a pair.
notabot@piefed.social 1 day ago
The formatting on your comment seems have gotten a little messed up, so appologies if I’ve missed your point, but the paper seems quite specific that the pair
(h,h')is not equivalent to(h',h), especially in term of Def 1. For instance, the result off(h,h')may be positive while the result off(h',h)is negative or zero.Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 21 hours ago
The formatting you’re seeing is controlled by carets (^). Just replace the start and end of the superscript text with them.
I see this often when talking about exponents: x^2 is less than x^3.
The superscript needs to be surrounded to work properly: x^(x+1)^ is greater than x^(x-1)^.
guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip 23 hours ago
Thank god I just took my set theory course
observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Ha! Also, small world, OOP is a friend of a friend.
BigDiction@lemmy.world 14 minutes ago
Thanks I’m going to send this to my wife. Hoping to spice things up tonight.