parody
@parody@lemmings.world
- Comment on Stop making up states 5 days ago:
What’s a Fllorida
- Comment on Ewww 1 week ago:
Every woman’s hand you’ve touched has been in a vagina.
Go on…
- Comment on Anon dates a clown 2 weeks ago:
Waddaya have that’s a little easier?
- Comment on Just a light frosting. 2 weeks ago:
You should see the couch they’re keeping
- Comment on Bat Drip 3 weeks ago:
- Comment on Why do some folks insist they'll only listen to their doctors? 1 month ago:
I like it! Thanks :)
- Comment on I just need to keep it steady 1 month ago:
Not gonna be anti-slip when girls see it 💦
- Comment on Pressure washing 2 months ago:
Seem to work as an enema but concerning without knowing the bidet was deep cleaned moments before. Any thoughts on this very common thing we all like to talk about?
- Submitted 5 months ago to [deleted] | 4 comments
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 5 months ago:
Did they just e.g. remove a passing car from the background*, and will tags on some images lead to untagged fake images being trusted more? Oh this fun new world we’re in.
*as someone else pointed out, if it was a minor edit, was the underlying technology using legit training data or unlicensed stuff
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 5 months ago:
trained on data they’re actually allowed to train on
That’s the ticket. For touchups, certainly, that’s the key: did theft help, or not?
- Comment on The heart we can't neglect indeed 5 months ago:
This will always work with a LLM.
IDK, plenty of defenses I couldn’t break:
Can any of you break top 5? :)
Only one person beat the sloth:
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 5 months ago:
He just won’t stop!
Aight I repeated “cherry picked” earlier… no:
“Curated.” Was happy to curate a few of the more interesting comments for our community.
If I weren’t so lazy I might’ve found another comment in favor of the labeling to bump up the screenshotted proportion of replies in support from the 25% seen in my OP. Still, think I did an aight job.
Okayyy night now haha
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 5 months ago:
Thanks for the edit. We all love that intellectual honesty!
Don’t miss this absolute roast though:
Roasted and salted 🥜
Now -
1: I should’ve been more clear… those full screen screenshots are so enormous, Lemmy has to compress them for cost and UX reasons.
2: Screenshot over link is a very intentional choice. Even if you’re positive you would’ve clicked based on the title, there are some great responses in this thread that I guarantee you we would not have been blessed with if this post had been a link instead of an image.
Everyone is busy. Lots of us work away on keyboards all day, and we hop on here just to scroll casually. Some huge forum thread? Forget it! A little screenshot that has teasers and can be digested bit by bit, with the leading post in the image helping folks decide whether they care enough to read the rest of the image and furthermore to find a source? (either by an OP or commenter’s source link, or exact match web search of an OCR’d phrase from the image) That’s the best shot we have at easing in as many people as possible into a topic. (Do feel bad for the vision impaired, hopefully the source link is a decent standin.) But for 98% of us this is prob the way. Aight maybe 95%, you got a good community response to your comment :)
Thanks for chiming in m’lord
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 5 months ago:
I imagine we’ll need specialized hardware in the future.
The president allegedly made a gaffe on film? Let’s see that chain of custody, that raw file hash on the Canon/RED/Sony servers…
Ooh, something to this end was released in 2022!
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 5 months ago:
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 5 months ago:
It’s like they’re ignoring the pixel I captured in the bottom left!
Really interesting analogy.
Also I imagine most anybody who gets a photo labeled will find a trick before making their next post. Copy the final image to a new PSD… print and scan for the less technically inclined… heh
- Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”?lemmings.world ↗Submitted 5 months ago to [deleted] | 99 comments
- Comment on Why do some folks insist they'll only listen to their doctors? 5 months ago:
lol fair. Point taken!
Not a counterpoint to you, but a shoutout to this one doc:
You reminded me of a time 15 years ago when I very timidly mentioned to a doctor that I did do a very quick Google search, and the doctor quickly affirmed me: “hey, Google is a source!” or something like that. I further explained something like “OBVIOUSLY I came here to talk to a person with REAL medical experience, which is why I feel silly bringing it up, but …”
I’m thankful I wasn’t searching for how to purify toxins with sterile beverages. Thank you :)
- Comment on Why do some folks insist they'll only listen to their doctors? 6 months ago:
How do you explain me sticking to the fridge?
- Comment on Why do some folks insist they'll only listen to their doctors? 6 months ago:
Good laying out the cost-benefit here.
there would also be papers with research, and I’m better off reading that.
I had this in mind: that eventually somebody links some paper where they’ve read the abstract… then it’s sensible to read the whole thing and see if it’s worth discussing with someone qualified I suppose.
Thanks 🙂
- Comment on Why do some folks insist they'll only listen to their doctors? 6 months ago:
Thanks for the great input everybody!
- Comment on Why do some folks insist they'll only listen to their doctors? 6 months ago:
Haha might just ask “hey does the gearbox ever rumble like that?”, that’s all 🙂
s/o to old school car forums who’ve guided my way when I’ve known zero, btw
- Comment on Why do some folks insist they'll only listen to their doctors? 6 months ago:
Good point.
Would you take a risk when reading from someone who may be lying to you, to the point you would
scribble down some questions to ask your own medical folks
?
- Comment on Why do some folks insist they'll only listen to their doctors? 6 months ago:
Yeah it sure is, probably the top reason the parody was so dumb.
In fact I only have one user in mind writing this post, someone I forget who posted long ago about a condition I cannot remember.
I think they said they would block anyone who tried to offer any advice. But even they had probably had years and years of second and nth opinions.
Come to think of it, I think I’m also responding to someone who demanded anyone seeking care “listen to your doctors!“ in a way that seem to preclude the fact that there is a safe way to use the fallible input of anonymous strangers as a tentative guiding factor.
- Submitted 6 months ago to [deleted] | 30 comments
