parody
@parody@lemmings.world
- Comment on I will take no arguments 3 weeks ago:
Now they’re technically not blanks 🙏
- Comment on Wobble Wobble 4 weeks ago:
:’(
- Comment on Enemies 5 weeks ago:
More like W size
- Comment on I kinda feel like if I had one good fart, that'd really sort things out for me right now 1 month ago:
Even if I thought I was done for the day
Interesting, never a thought I’ve had… hmm, you make me wanna try keeping a journal for a week
(You know, a journal, a diarrhy)
- Comment on If me and a bunch of my lemmy friends got on a yacht. Went into international waters what could we get away with legally and what would still be illegal? 1 month ago:
Upvoted to compensate for the two masturbators who downvoted you
- Comment on Maybe, just maybe, a company that refuses to give you time off if you have a bullet inside of you is a really really shitty company 1 month ago:
That’s no more than like 15% of us bro, don’t lump us all in
- Comment on Rainbolt never misses 1 month ago:
- Comment on Water 1 month ago:
Chad water / virgin Milky Way
- Comment on "Images of 'Saint Luigi Mangione, The patron saint of health care justice' have been making rounds on social media" 1 month ago:
What an absolute badass - thanks for sharing
- Comment on "Images of 'Saint Luigi Mangione, The patron saint of health care justice' have been making rounds on social media" 1 month ago:
Thanks updated!
- "Images of 'Saint Luigi Mangione, The patron saint of health care justice' have been making rounds on social media"lemmings.world ↗Submitted 1 month ago to [deleted] | 158 comments
- Comment on Stop making up states 2 months ago:
What’s a Fllorida
- Comment on Ewww 2 months ago:
Every woman’s hand you’ve touched has been in a vagina.
Go on…
- Comment on Anon dates a clown 2 months ago:
Waddaya have that’s a little easier?
- Comment on Just a light frosting. 2 months ago:
You should see the couch they’re keeping
- Comment on Bat Drip 2 months ago:
- Comment on Why do some folks insist they'll only listen to their doctors? 3 months ago:
I like it! Thanks :)
- Comment on I just need to keep it steady 3 months ago:
Not gonna be anti-slip when girls see it 💦
- Comment on Pressure washing 5 months ago:
Seem to work as an enema but concerning without knowing the bidet was deep cleaned moments before. Any thoughts on this very common thing we all like to talk about?
- Submitted 7 months ago to [deleted] | 4 comments
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 7 months ago:
Did they just e.g. remove a passing car from the background*, and will tags on some images lead to untagged fake images being trusted more? Oh this fun new world we’re in.
*as someone else pointed out, if it was a minor edit, was the underlying technology using legit training data or unlicensed stuff
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 7 months ago:
trained on data they’re actually allowed to train on
That’s the ticket. For touchups, certainly, that’s the key: did theft help, or not?
- Comment on The heart we can't neglect indeed 7 months ago:
This will always work with a LLM.
IDK, plenty of defenses I couldn’t break:
Can any of you break top 5? :)
Only one person beat the sloth:
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 7 months ago:
He just won’t stop!
Aight I repeated “cherry picked” earlier… no:
“Curated.” Was happy to curate a few of the more interesting comments for our community.
If I weren’t so lazy I might’ve found another comment in favor of the labeling to bump up the screenshotted proportion of replies in support from the 25% seen in my OP. Still, think I did an aight job.
Okayyy night now haha
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 7 months ago:
Thanks for the edit. We all love that intellectual honesty!
Don’t miss this absolute roast though:
Roasted and salted 🥜
Now -
1: I should’ve been more clear… those full screen screenshots are so enormous, Lemmy has to compress them for cost and UX reasons.
2: Screenshot over link is a very intentional choice. Even if you’re positive you would’ve clicked based on the title, there are some great responses in this thread that I guarantee you we would not have been blessed with if this post had been a link instead of an image.
Everyone is busy. Lots of us work away on keyboards all day, and we hop on here just to scroll casually. Some huge forum thread? Forget it! A little screenshot that has teasers and can be digested bit by bit, with the leading post in the image helping folks decide whether they care enough to read the rest of the image and furthermore to find a source? (either by an OP or commenter’s source link, or exact match web search of an OCR’d phrase from the image) That’s the best shot we have at easing in as many people as possible into a topic. (Do feel bad for the vision impaired, hopefully the source link is a decent standin.) But for 98% of us this is prob the way. Aight maybe 95%, you got a good community response to your comment :)
Thanks for chiming in m’lord
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 7 months ago:
I imagine we’ll need specialized hardware in the future.
The president allegedly made a gaffe on film? Let’s see that chain of custody, that raw file hash on the Canon/RED/Sony servers…
Ooh, something to this end was released in 2022!
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 7 months ago:
- Comment on Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”? 7 months ago:
It’s like they’re ignoring the pixel I captured in the bottom left!
Really interesting analogy.
Also I imagine most anybody who gets a photo labeled will find a trick before making their next post. Copy the final image to a new PSD… print and scan for the less technically inclined… heh
- Photographers Push Back on Facebook's 'Made with AI' Labels Triggered by Adobe Metadata. Do you agree “‘AI was used in this image’ is completely different than ‘Made with AI’”?lemmings.world ↗Submitted 7 months ago to [deleted] | 99 comments
- Comment on Why do some folks insist they'll only listen to their doctors? 8 months ago:
lol fair. Point taken!
Not a counterpoint to you, but a shoutout to this one doc:
You reminded me of a time 15 years ago when I very timidly mentioned to a doctor that I did do a very quick Google search, and the doctor quickly affirmed me: “hey, Google is a source!” or something like that. I further explained something like “OBVIOUSLY I came here to talk to a person with REAL medical experience, which is why I feel silly bringing it up, but …”
I’m thankful I wasn’t searching for how to purify toxins with sterile beverages. Thank you :)
