Literally why wealthy people pay exorbitant amounts of money to save time. It’s one thing they can’t buy back once it’s spent.
Being poor is expensive
Submitted 2 weeks ago by VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to workreform@lemmy.world
https://discuss.online/pictrs/image/84681b0b-d1f9-46f4-9259-edb5f52d8e54.jpeg
Comments
Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
For the laundry stuff, this is a cheap solution for your day to day stuff: a washer spinner that you hang-dry your clothes. Doesn’t help much with heavy stuff like bed sheets, but it’ll do for day-to-day stuff.
AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
And the mecical bills one accrues for treatment of the ailments that are brought on by an immune system weakened by constant stress.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 2 weeks ago
I usually choose the bus over my own vehicle regardless, and Laundromats are generally too expensive unless you’ve got greasers or can pay to have your laundry done for you.
DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
greasers ?
I’ve seen that term used for some White youth and also Mexicans.
What does it mean here?
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 2 weeks ago
Greasers in reference to laundry are a colloquial term for rags and clothes covered in Grease such as Petrol, Motor Oil, etc.
You have to take them to a Laundromat that allows them because they will damage or cause residential washers and dryers to stick or smell.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I do too, but keep in mind we’re outliers for whom the economic cost of taking the bus is negative. There’s a thousand other little luxuries we enjoy without even noticing all of them.
Artisian@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Do we have data on how much free time and external costs the poor have been burdened with over time?
I could see it going either way (and this is presumably monstrously tricky to account fairly). My lived experience is that many folks have things they’d prefer to do than organizing (I’m looking at phones and social media), over and above the impositions on their lives. But I’d like to know that I’m wrong.
Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
It’s by design
AlboTheGuy@feddit.nl 2 weeks ago
Time is money to money is time
Sparky@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Better living is brought about by better technology, not having more money
umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
are phones and social media making the world better? is ai?
MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Yeah all these machines were supposed to have us working ten hours a week by now for a living wage what’s that about?!
remon@ani.social 2 weeks ago
Gentryfried@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
Start a homestead in the wilderness, every moment spent goes towards your goals
DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
A working horse; one who is trained to pull a plow, costs a minimum of $3,000.00 in the USA today. Also, there’s no such thing as ‘wilderness.’ There’s plenty of uncultivated land, but it’s all owned by the government or private interests who would be averse to you showing up and planting crops.
I suggest you go to the local library and get access to the interwebs, so you can check the facts before you start making silly suggestions.
floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
Just get a small loan of a few million from your parents. Honestly, why don’t more of the poor think of this?
Dookieman12@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Facts and nuance don’t mean anything when you’re an angry little teenaged shit on the internet.
Doom@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
So destroy more forest to grow food for one person? May I suggest an alternative. We protect the little forest that remains and instead relax zoning laws to allow people to grow food on the countless acres of grassy yard space/land we already have. Grass is an outdated non native crop originally grown by rich assholes as a staus symbol to say “I have so much I do not need to use my land for anything productive.”
RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
You don’t have to tear down a forest to grow food. There are far more options out there for growing food than conventional modern farming.
Gentryfried@feddit.uk 1 week ago
Slave mindset
NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 2 weeks ago
If you believe it’s that simple, you should look into it.
The biggest problems are water access and soil quality. Generally speaking, all of the land that is good for farming is not wilderness, it’s aldeady owned and in use by somebody. If you have to spend money to irrigate and more money to make the soil into something that can grow food, you’ll be broke long before you’re self-sustaining.
lyrial@anarchist.nexus 2 weeks ago
And, spoiler alert; even if you manage to get kand with water access, you are going to go through hell to get the rights to use that water in any meaningful way. Try something as simple as rain water collection with mout the rights? Best case is a massive fine.