Glad they're looking out for me

Comments

• Zephyr@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  If it’s a free service it’s definitely not in your favor. If it’s a pair service, still most likely not in your favor.

  I always remember that case where someone got injured at Disneyland and part of their Disney plus subscription is an agreement they can’t sue Disney.

  source

  • DonGirses@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    IIRC they died(?) due to allergens in food that was supposed to be allergen free and due to their D+ subscription they waived their rights to sue (bullshit)

    source

    • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      Definitely more fucked than I remembered.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      That is so fucked up. The family should sue to have the terms stricken from the agreement and then sue for killing their person. Some jurisdictions don’t allow bullshit in the T&Cs like that.

      But also Disney has a whole department of the most expensive lawyers in the world, so they’ll probably have to find a real heavy-hitter who does pro bono work.

      Or a family member who doesn’t have D+ could sue…

      source
  • StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Injured? IIRC the person died.

    source
  • ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    That’s what they get for not pirating.

    source

    • harmbugler@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      My lawyer advised me to pirate media to reduce my legal exposure. Just kidding… for now.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • dan@upvote.au ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    It’s crazy that forfdd arbitration is legal.

    source
• LovableSidekick@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Yes, just like HR is there for employees.

  source
• bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  That actually is a regular occurrence when their previous terms are judged to be illegal.

  source

  • can@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    That’s still ultimately looking out for themselves

    source
• MalReynolds@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  I have altered the deal. Pray I don’t alter it further.

  source

  • airbreather@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    This deal’s getting worse all the time…

    source
  • TwistedTurtle@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Cloud services in a nutshell.

    source
• 30p87@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  We and our 62894260215 Partners, including at least five modern versions of the SS, 35 Governments and the public, want the best for your privacy and security.

  source
• Avicenna@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  “We are doing some shady shit with your data and the world caught up to this so we now found a new loophole and thus had to update our privacy terms. Love and kisses.”

  source

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Samsung says I have to accept their privacy policy to continue using my phone. I have ignored that push message for like 4 years out of pure spite… I wonder what would happen if I did end up in court for some reason. I assume their lawyers would just argue that me using the phone is accepting the policy, whether I have read the policy or not.

    source
• sunsofold@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  It’s absolutely for your benefit! Oh, wait, did you say user? I thought shareholder. No, you can get in line for the rectal probing with everyone else.

  source
• El_Scapacabra@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  The same way that when a “New and Improved” product is never improved for the benefit of us. It’s improving their bottom line.

  source
• garbage_world@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Fuck privacy terms and conditions. All services should be able to collect all data they can

  source