Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

How come there is so many commercials to make a guy hard but not something for women that will enjoy sex more? No pun intended in this but why are women getting royally fucked?

⁨11⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Patnou@lemmy.world⁩ to ⁨[deleted]⁩

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • yellerbadger@piefed.social ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    There’s a conflation of concepts here. Having an erection and enjoying sex are two separate things. Porn stars take Viagra to stay hard for uncomfortable sex for instance and men have been slipped Viagra to make it easier to sexually assault. It’s easy to give a man an erection. The mechanism is well known that you want to ultimately get vasodilation going on in the corpus cavernosum so blood pools there. Enjoying sex more is a much broader thing for women (and men). It’s possible that someone who had a pubic nerve injury or has cardiovascular problems would have better sex with Viagra. The problem might be elsewhere. Maybe it’s trauma. Maybe it’s pain/vaginismus. Maybe it’s not having explored one’s body yet.

    source
  • SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Because marketers found it far more effective to make ads targeting women appeal to their anxieties.

    source
    • Apepollo11@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Mitchell and Webb did a terrific sketch on this concept.

      Mitchell and Webb - Advertising

      source
    • lovely_reader@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I don’t doubt this, but I also don’t remember when they tested it, do you? What kind of failed horny lady ads am I forgetting through the years?

      source
  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I imagine a variety of different commercials would make a variety of different men “hard”.

    source
  • Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I remember hearing some years ago that Viagra was also effective in getting women in the mood.

    I’m guessing it’s the usual, it’s more complicated, expensive, and the people who make those decisions aren’t interested in women’s pleasure.

    source
  • crazycraw@crazypeople.online ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    because, like, society.

    (not that it’s right}

    source
  • Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Yeah! How come!?

    source
  • LoonyLenny@lemdro.id ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    This guy offered vaginal tightening

    ctvnews.ca/…/bc-man-sentenced-to-11-years-for-sex…

    source
  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Because male arousal is needed for receptive sex while female arousal is not.

    source