[deleted]
Why is it cheaper to find and view 2 Girls 1 Cup than it is to read the news on NY Times?
Submitted 2 months ago by over_clox@lemmy.world to [deleted]
Comments
adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
Let’s rephrase the question: “is it cheaper to find and view that popular video from 20 years ago than a single news article the NY Times released 20 years ago?”
Otherwise, you’re comparing a current events media platform to a once-popular video hosted everywhere.
burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
The girls in that video certainly do not get royalty checks
VeryVito@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Neither do the reporters who write for the Times or any other newspaper.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 months ago
It’s still expensive to run an ongoing news organisation, unlike a janky old video from decades ago.
Apepollo11@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I wonder what became of them. I like to think they finally bought a second cup so they didn’t have to share anymore.
deranger@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Because the infamous 2 girls 1 cup video is just a trailer. It was always meant to be free.
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Because of the two, two girls 1 cup has less shit in it.
jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Bravo, sir…bravo.