If you came here to say it’s all part of the plan. Then what is the plan from begining to end??
It is generally part of the job description. A soldier in a war has a high probability in dying. A soldier’s death is a typical cost to war. A politician, in contrast, doesn’t have death as a potential risk to their profession. If anything, the death of a politician is generally a sign of the state being actively harmed.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 week ago
A soldier is an active and usually willing participant in homicidal violence. If they’re killed, that’s merely the chance they took. A soldier either kills or is killed, so it isn’t a shock.
A politician is usually expected to be non-violent, and political violence is a way to intimidate the electorate so it is more personal to people.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 week ago
If that’s the case, then what about cops? Cops use the threat of violence to put people in rooms and take their currency vouchers. If a cop is killed, any sensible society would go “well that’s just the risk you take by threatening violence all day long”
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 week ago
Probably a case of mistakenly believing everywhere is like America
CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Its a double standard perpetuated by institutional corruption and a powerful police union.