Arguably this is a heretical perversion of TempleOS, as obviously this is a direct digital interface with God, and obviously God already knows everything about each and every one of us.
oh fuck 😨
Submitted 2 months ago by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to [deleted]
https://media.kawen.space/media/1dad8819c33bbd0d54f7fbd37bb1efb3ec1d5dafff5e0ac35ab1ac6ed6617716.png
Comments
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
redsand@infosec.pub 2 months ago
For those unaware the creator of TempleOS
diedascended a few years ago. Reformed really would be the minimum here as almost all of the code was written by him alone.sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Terry Davis was an insane bigot, but goddamn, could that dude code.
Beyond that uh, I wash my hands of this.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Does the bitmap need to be 16 color, 640x480?
Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Is an ASCII video okay?
Anyone remember the startrek ASCII video?
frank@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
Wasn’t it the first (IV) episode of Star Wars? Maybe both existed
b_tr3e@feddit.org 2 months ago
That one you could watch via telnet?
Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 months ago
Only god can verify my age 🙏
AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 2 months ago
Surely the law would have a religious exemption which would apply in this case
CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
I know this comment is a joke, but the CA bill requires age bucketing for to be provided by the OS to “covered stores”. Basically, any source of 3rd party programs.
Since TempleOS (at least, the original one written solely by Terry Davis) has no networking stack, no such “covered store” can exist. I think there’s not even support to load external storage drives, so all programs on the machine are either written by the user or provided first-party by the OS. I think TempleOS would be exempt on those grounds.
Sv443@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
It does actually have “half-assed FAT32 support” and I remember LTT managed to mount something back when they reviewed it.
Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
I’m writing my lawyer as we speak.
Nah but wouldn’t that be legitimately wild if someone pushed that to the point to where California had to make an exemption for temple OS specifically?
Dude now that I think about this I wonder if this could work.
gurty@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Glowies finally got to TempleOS.
BigBrownBeaver@lemmy.world 2 months ago
So if you’re > 13, please go somewhere else?
mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
thank you for adding a giant red arrow and fake snapchat caption to the meme
andybytes@programming.dev 2 months ago
Hey did you know age verification is coming to Linux? Gonna basically be spyware for those who bomb little girls in schools.
kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
If you’re actually trying to spread some sort of awareness by spamming the same comment over and over across the fediverse, then at least post some sources with it.
aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Cali and Colorado’s laws are worded extremely broadly, so it’s a bit up in the air how it will shake out.
Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
The only thing Linux did that I don’t agree with was remove people with Russian nationality. I think that was more wrong than them allowing you to put whatever age you want at the beginning of startup.
I will say though that this is not the endgame. Porn sites started out this way too just enter an age and good to go. Eventually, it will be pushed to a point you have to upload ID now that might take years and years but when it happens there will be some distros left that won’t play ball.
Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
I guess the religious sites don’t let you in if you are over a certain age.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 months ago
Being underage is a welcome advantage in those circles. They aren’t trying to keep the kids out, they’re trying to invite them in.