Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

The man who drove his car into 100 people should be able to drive again, Judge rules.

⁨94⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Feb@sh.itjust.works⁩ to ⁨videos@lemmy.world⁩

https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/427244d6fc72.mp4

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    I mean to be fair, that’s how prison is supposed to work. Rehabilitate the person so after, they’re fit to become a normal member of society again.

    Of course, that’s only the theory of a few enlightened people…

    source
    • Bonifratz@piefed.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      I agree this is how prison should work. However, in my opinion this is not how driver’s licenses should work. I think it should be possible to forfeit any chance of ever driving again.

      source
      • binarytobis@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Roughly agree.

        Loosely related, I’ve been thinking recently that we really need to make it harder to get and keep a license. I’ve noticed a lot of absolutely terrible drivers don’t even realize they are driving badly. If they had to, say, pass a driving test every 3-5 years then someone would tell them exactly what they are doing wrong, and keep them from the streets until they fix it.

        source
      • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        I wouldn’t quite agree. Sure, a car can be used as a weapon, but that’s not its primary function. I’m not aware of the exact case, but if prison rehabilitated him in a way that he no longer uses a car as a weapon, I really see no reason why he shouldn’t get a driving license. Unfortunate as it may be, not being able to have a car is a severe disadvantage in a lot of areas.

        I would agree with you if it was about a gun license. Having a gun is only useful as a weapon.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Pringles@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      That is exactly how it should work and not nearly enough people recognize that. It’s part of the social contract: You break the rules, you get punished. After the punishment, you are a full member of society again.

      Otherwise you just get punished again and that should not be the case.

      source
  • obinice@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Fair enough, the whole point of the prison system is to rehabilitate people who commit a crime to hopefully minimise the risk that they’ll commit crimes in the future, and return them to the world to be a net positive benefit to society from there on out.

    If we lived in a world country where we assumed criminals could never be rehabilitated and would simply continue to commit crimes after their time in custody, why even keep them alive wasting time and resources? That system would benefit from simply executing all criminals on the spot.

    Which would be insane.

    source
    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      No it would benefit from selling them as slave labor.

      source
  • BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    He was given 21.5 years in prison, it’s not gonna matter much if he can apply for a license after getting out from that. Looking at him, I’d say he’s around 45-55, so 21.5 means he’ll be and to the point of more likely to fail the exam then pass it.

    source
  • Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Car brains doing car brain things.

    source
  • Bonesince1997@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    That judge’s outfit looks completely goofy. That’s not his real hair, right?

    source
    • blueamigafan@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      No it’s traditional attire that judges wear here in the UK

      source
      • protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        i feel bad for the people who need to use it

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Diddlydee@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      That’s his wools (white horsehair), hence the phrase ‘pull the wool over his eyes’. They come from the reign of Charles II and have a symbolic purpose that shows both anonymity and authority.

      I think only judges at Crown Courts would wear them. You wouldn’t see them in magistrates courts or county courts.

      They also used to be used in the 17th century to hide symptoms of diseases such as lice, hair loss, scabs etc.

      source
      • Bonesince1997@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Thanks for the explanation!

        source
    • mbp@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Imagine this mf tells you you’re gonna die in prison.

      source
      • Bonesince1997@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        Judge, your hi vis robe is distracting me.

        source
  • treno_rosso@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Probably got a bit too hot under that wig, smh.

    source
  • ohulancutash@feddit.uk ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    He can apply….

    source
  • essell@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    This feels like we’ve buried the lead.

    Would denying him a license stop him using a car to murder?

    I’m sure he wouldn’t want to break the traffic laws.

    source