Menger cheese = string cheese

Comments

• homes@piefed.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  This is why I don’t trust math. It steals cheese.

  source
• dp@thebrainbin.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Less cheese = fewer holes
  Fewer holes = more cheese
  Less cheese = more cheese

  less cheese = more cheese = less cheese = more cheese → ∞: infinite cheese glitch

  source

  • cRazi_man@europe.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    And infinite holes glitch

    source

    • MotoAsh@piefed.social ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I thought that was a knife.

      source
  • four@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    cheese = cheese <=> more = less

    source
• Zerush@lemmy.ml ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  No cat has 5 legs, but a cat has 4 legs more than no cat, so a cat has 9 legs

  source

  • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Cat has 9 legs and 9 lives, 1 leg per life. Human has 2 legs. Humans have 2 lives

    source
• Ephera@lemmy.ml ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  There’s these “ontological arguments”, which are basically folks trying to prove the existence of a god by reasoning with pure logic, so without relying on evidence. And they all sound like that. 🫠

  One of the classics goes roughly like this:

  1. There is good and bad. (Which is one hell of an axiom.)
  2. A creature can exist which unifies all good properties. (Yet another hell of an axiom.)
  3. Because this creature has all these good properties, it would be even gooder, if it did exist.
  4. Since this creature unifies all good properties and its existence is itself a good property, it therefore must exist.

  These arguments are also always funny, because the same logic can be used to “prove” all kinds of things. For example, a perfect island can exist, therefore it must exist. 🙃
  As far as I can tell, the arguments don’t actually get better over time either, but rather just more convoluted, to make it less obvious how silly they are…

  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_argument

  source

  • MotoAsh@piefed.social ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I usually heard the BS from a creationist perspective.

    The universe cannot exist without a creator … which is also a hell of an assumption to turn into an axiom.

    and people say religion doesn’t harm people… It obliterates their ability to logic.

    source
• SethranKada@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Im bored and tired, so im going to write my reasoning out as I attempt to fall asleep.

  More cheese = more holes

  More cheese (volune) = more holes (volume)

  More holes (percentage) = less cheese (percentage)

  This cheese is refering yo the material, where the first is referring to the object. Different variables entirely. The first is a group that explicitly includes holes, while the latter explicitly doesn’t.

  More cheese (volume) = less cheese (percentage)

  Idk man im tired.

  source

  • cryoistalline@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    its because the meme sneakily saying more holes (volume) = more holes (percentage), then using transitivity of equality. This equality isn’t allowed since the units doesn’t match.

    source
  • Bubs@lemmy.zip ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Here’s how I think is the best way to word it:

    There are really two types of “more holes”

    The first is the number of holes. Double the volume of cheese and you double the number of holes.

    The second is the density of holes. Say the cheese has 1 hole per cubic inch. Double it to 2 holes per inch and you have twice the empty volume

    The first phrase increases the number of holes by merely increasing the volume of cheese.

    The second phase increases the number of holes by increasing their density.

    source
  • Floodedwomb@lemmy.world ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Cheese is parceled out by weight, so holes are irrelevant.

    source
• T3CHT@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Looks, there has gotta be a divide by zero in there somewhere, but I can’t find it.

  But if I divide by less, Cheese = more/less cheese Which seems legit

  source

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    RENORMALIZE YOUR CHEESE!
    RENORMALIZE YOUR CHEESE!
    RENORMALIZE YOUR CHEESE!

    Sweep your Infinity Cheese Infinities
    under the Persian rug!

    source
  • i_love_FFT@jlai.lu ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    More cheese = I eat more cheese = more missing cheese = less cheese

    source
• darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Emmental can go fuck themselves. Appenzell makes superior cheese.

  source
• niktemadur@lemmy.world ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Dude is tapping into Cantor’s infinite empty set and doesn’t know it!

  source
• fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Image

  source
• edinbruh@feddit.it ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Shrinkflation

  source
• corvus@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Not surprising coming from a cat, not its field of expertise. Ask a mouse.

  source
• Beacon@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  This is a denominator numerator trick.

  source
• dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  yes cat, cheese with holes is less cheese than cheese without holes

  source
• aeronmelon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  m.youtube.com/shorts/AicvHdWIDP8

  source