This is actually an upscaled work in progress, not finished yet, but I’m working on templates for a future tattoo.
Yes that’s hand drawn. Yes it’s already scannable…
Submitted 15 hours ago by over_clox@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/e35be650-aca6-4f47-a83e-e946f04470b1.jpeg
This is actually an upscaled work in progress, not finished yet, but I’m working on templates for a future tattoo.
Yes that’s hand drawn. Yes it’s already scannable…
Wouldn’t that have been easier on grid paper? Why use ruled paper?
They drew QR code by hand. Do we realy think the ease was a factor here?
I didn’t have ruled paper handy. Ideas came to mind, and I just wanted to start sketching like immediately.
Yes awkward, but also kinda helps relieve my stress as well…
Having to do a QR code without a grid would have the opposite effect of “relieving stress” for me :)
it’s tonga time.
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 13 hours ago
Why wouldn’t it be? I’ve drawn 2 QR codes on graph paper already and of course they work.
over_clox@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Curious I am now, trailing slash?
This wasn’t encoded with a trailing slash, nor does the scanner app I use decode it with a trailing slash.
I’m not sure, but if it is decoding with a trailing slash on your side, that might be your scanner app doing that automatically.
Formally speaking, coming from the dialup internet days, full proper URLs were meant to end in a trailing slash, and if you didn’t type the trailing slash in yourself, some web browsers would have to ping the site twice before it figured out it needed that trailing slash, slowing down website loading time.
I dunno, thank goodness the internet has evolved enough where www.time.gov can be simplified to time.gov
On my end, my web browser itself (Fennec, a fork of Firefox), put the trailing slash in on its own… 🤷
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Yeah the QR standard is astoundingly resilient to noise. iirc the highest redundancy can still be read with 60% of the glyph obscured, it’s really a fascinating protocol.
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 7 hours ago
Nah, it’s 30%, and very much depends on how the damage is laid out.
FishFace@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
With hand drawn codes it’s also that the scanners are very good. It’s no good having high redundancy if the scanner can’t transform the 3D code to a square and find the timing bits etc
over_clox@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
I’m trying to confirm this shit even works before I get it tattooed on my wrist at a 1mm per square scale…
JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 hours ago
Hey OP, I’ve seen a lot of tattoo artists recommend not getting QR codes tattooed because they fade and smear over time. Also, I don’t wanna sound overly dramatic, but with the current political landscape being to aggressively cut government programs, I wouldn’t trust a domain name being around forever. It may still be better for the code to be one you control (they’re like $12 a year) and set it to redirect there instead.
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 13 hours ago
Print one out at 1:1 scale and wrap it around your wrist, then test it. Curved surfaces are challenging for QR code readers. AFAIK Google Lens is one of the best ones (it will follow edges of pixels in wavy codes) but you’ll want any old open source one to work.
crumbguzzler5000@feddit.org 13 hours ago
Tattoos can get a little blurry over time, especially when they are really small. Look at examples of people who get little quotes or words written in cursive, sometimes they become almost unreadable.