OK, but are there any downsides? I see nothing wrong with that.
Nick Clegg says asking artists for use permission would ‘kill’ the AI industry
Submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.zip
https://www.theverge.com/news/674366/nick-clegg-uk-ai-artists-policy-letter
Comments
Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
Oh no, we can’t make slop without stealing? The horror!
jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
It’s terrible garbage, but we need to do illegal things to create it!
lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 weeks ago
Aah, cut off the crap Clegg.
Under the current IP and copyright laws across the world, your argument has as much merit as “let robbers steal; asking others permission before snatching their stuff would ‘kill’ the black market”.
And, if the idiotic laws are to be revoked, they should be revoked for everyone. This would allow you to train your bloody models on those artists - but it would also allow everyone to grab things from your “industry” and you should not be able to do anything against them.
Pick a choice. One of those two. Enough of this bloody Bob Dylan defence* - either everyone is a thief, or everyone is a king; your industry is not such special snowflake, and you are not a higher caste above the rest of us dammit.
* Steal a little and they throw you in jail / Steal a lot and they make you king
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Jomega@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
If it dies, it dies.
jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
It wouldn’t kill it. It would just force them to use public domain and CC content like the rest of us
mjhelto@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
I can’t make my Mini-mouse with hunky Millhouse crossover sex art without a C&D and psychology recommendation, but sure, these rich assholes can steal the works of others. Somehow their business is more important than the rights of the people that they would definitely sue if you showed more than 3s of copyrighted work that they owned…
Archangel1313@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
This sounds like a perfectly acceptable outcome.
AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 3 weeks ago
I’d urge people watch and read Alex Avila’s essay on how the bourgeoisie are controlling the internet through anti ai campaigning.
It’s pretty damning, and it’s all about control. Larceny is wrong indeed, but AI corporations are NOT being charged with intellectual property “theft,” which is the crux of this counter capitalist campaign.
SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
If the rich wanted AI regulated, they would have made the politicians they own pass those policies.
AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 3 weeks ago
Which they have… see the video, it’s full of citations and collusion.
JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Then let it die.
MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
The alternative being, killing the art industry?
altphoto@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
They should get into torrents.
cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Meta’s former head of global affairs said …
ZimRoxo@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
If your industry depends on theft to survive maybe your industry shouldn't exist? Just a thought