Why is this a shit post? This is like straight out of Silicon Valley.
Auto sorting trash can
Submitted 21 hours ago by Mickey7@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/aMVzAqX_460svvp9.webm
Comments
NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 hours ago
frankenswine@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
more like trash post
Fabian@lemmy.zip 20 hours ago
But it does seem rather ineffective and way too expensive. What happens if you put two different items there?
crank0271@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
So we all agree that it’s peak Silicon Valley.
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 19 hours ago
And it won’t be long until someone spills something on the flap and it becomes sticky. Or an item is too large and gets stuck.
LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
If anyone puts two different items there at the same time, straight to jail.
ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 14 hours ago
Me: Throws picture of Ex
Bin: Doesn’t move
Screen: “Take her back. Is this correct?”
Coreidan@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Dope. It’s all going straight to a land fill anyway.
MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 14 hours ago
🙄 number 1 argument of people who don’t recycle because they don’t give a fuck
PunnyName@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
The problem is that recycling is a highly inefficient process, propped up by lying ass oil barons who couldn’t give a shit about the planet, and care only about profits.
And it’s also likely going into the same landfill. We need to go back to the drawing board regarding plastic and waste.
Officer_Pickles@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
I was waiting for an “inappropriate” item to be thrown in.
LumpyPancakes@lemm.ee 19 hours ago
Two questions.
Griffindor?
… And what does it select for a pigeon?
mooncake@lemm.ee 19 hours ago
So you can only throw away one thing at a time
lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 18 hours ago
Nuclear waste, was that correct?
pupbiru@aussie.zone 18 hours ago
i can make a much cheaper, less complex, and perfectly accurate version of this that automatically sorts waste based on its final destination: it’s just a trash can and it all goes to the dump because recycling isn’t profitable :(
blueeggsandyam@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Mostly right except for aluminum and maybe PET #1 plastics. Glass should be washed and the bottles reused. It would be informative to the average person if it said “plastic, not recyclable “ so that people know for everything except PET.
What makes aluminum cans so unique is that they are often recycled back into themselves, containing nearly 70% recycled material. That is 3 times more than plastic or glass. This translates into the can’s leaving a good environmental footprint. It also has a high value for re-selling, making recycling programs possible. Scrap aluminum gets $1367 per ton, as compared to plastic that only gets $310, and glass actually gets $0 per ton. Cans are also getting lighter, while continuing to stay durable. This leads to better efficiency for shipping, and eventually less waste.