NewDayRocks
@NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- Comment on Hollow Knight: Silksong Sparks Debate About Difficulty and Boss Runbacks 1 week ago:
It’s a balance between immersion and world building and tedium.
In silksong the run backs never seen so far that it is tedious. The save point is not right next to the boss fights but for the most part they aren’t egariously far. Plus the save points serve as rest spots for the multiple paths you take. A save point at every boss would be detrimental imo.
- Comment on After More Layoffs, Unionized IGN Workers Are Done Picking Up The Slack: "We feel greatly understaffed and undervalued" 2 weeks ago:
Question for you - what do you think produces the profit for IGN? Is it the quality of their content or just their branding?
Are they too big to fail? That no matter what content they put out it will continue to produce the same profit regardless of how good it is?
Do you believe that a contractor at lower salary and benefits armed with AI will be able to handle the 2-3x workload that current employees are doing at comparable competency?
Do you believe that IGN will also be backfill all these positions that suddenly opened up and provide training without suffering a noticeable dip in productivity?
If you believe all that then sure, these employees have little to no power. Let’s see if IGN shares this sentiment and, if they do, let’s see if it works out for them.
- Comment on Lemmy be like 5 weeks ago:
Ok. Thanks for clarifying.
Although I am pretty sure AI is already used in the medical field for research and diagnosis. This “AI everywhere” trend you are seeing is the result of everyone trying to stick and use AI in every which way.
The thing about the AI boom is that lots of money is being invested into all fields. A bubble pop would result in investment money drying up everywhere, not make access to AI more affordable as you are suggesting.
- Comment on Lemmy be like 5 weeks ago:
You and OP are misunderstanding what is meant by good and cheap.
It’s not cheap from a resource perspective like you say. However that is irrelevant for the end user. It’s “cheap” already because it is either free or costs considerably less for the user than the cost of the resources used. OpenAI or Meta or Twitter are paying the cost. You do not need to pay for a monthly subscription to use AI.
So the quality of the content created is not limited by cost.
If the AI bubble popped, this won’t improve AI quality.
- Comment on Lemmy be like 5 weeks ago:
AI is good and cheap now because businesses are funding it at a loss, so not sure what you mean here.
The problem is that it’s cheap, so that anyone can make whatever they want and most people make low quality slop, hence why it’s not “good” in your eyes.
Making a cheap or efficient AI doesn’t help the end user in any way.
- Comment on Anon goes camping 3 months ago:
The missed pro tip: don’t believe everything you see on tv
- Comment on Auto sorting trash can 4 months ago:
Why is this a shit post? This is like straight out of Silicon Valley.
- Comment on Sounds right 4 months ago:
I respect that name
- Comment on Ubisoft says you "cannot complain" it shut down The Crew because you never actually owned it, and you weren't "deceived" by the lack of an offline version 5 months ago:
We are not accounting for the percentage of people who read it but are still cool with forfeiting their soul.
- Comment on [deleted] 7 months ago:
It’s not that relevant if, prior to the man performing multiple nazi salutes, we already knew he was a full blown fascist.