Number 6
Submitted 3 weeks ago by noxfortuna@lemm.ee to [deleted]
https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/019f322a-ad1a-4695-a902-37cf62072ebf.jpeg
Comments
But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
That’s got real Cinco Face Time Party Snoozer vibes.
AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 3 weeks ago
Thanks for coming.
Enkrod@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
Sure why not
not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
1 looks like Stand Up Mathematician Matt Parker wearing normal glasses.
jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
How do number go
Heavybell@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Gorilla glasses. Those are what protect my phone screen from damage, right?
Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Cigarette dude because I like to look cool af
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
3 is like, “why you all looking left?”
iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Who the hell numbers like that?
noxfortuna@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
People getting interrupted from meme-smithing by having to answer questions at work. Or maybe I was trying to be smart and write it boustrophedon style 🫠
Wolf314159@startrek.website 3 weeks ago
How is a zig-zag numbering any less valid than any other method? Your mapping a two dimensional space with what is essentially a line. Sometimes it doesn’t make sense for there to be discontinuities in the numbering, as one would have to do if the numbers always incremented in the same direction. Would you prefer that the numbers follow the path of a Hilbert Curve?
To answer your question though, surveyors have been using this method to number sections of land for much longer than you or I have been alive.