On today’s episode of “This shouldn’t be legal”…
Hmm… A perfectly neutral review with a share of the wording from the contract is nothing but factual, and I believe could be argued to be non disparaging?
Submitted 6 months ago by simple@lemm.ee to games@lemmy.world
https://files.catbox.moe/ousl3s.webp
On today’s episode of “This shouldn’t be legal”…
Hmm… A perfectly neutral review with a share of the wording from the contract is nothing but factual, and I believe could be argued to be non disparaging?
No, disparaging is disparaging, even if it’s warranted. But, if I were a small streamer who got a key, I would just repeat the non-disparagement clause any time I saw something obviously broken.
They can stop me saying anything negative but that doesn’t cover body language (they might try to sue but they wouldn’t ever be able to prove it to the degree required unless I had posted something like this explanation, and even then it’s dicey), and I don’t see anything in there about a minimum number of positive sentences of words to hit. God help these chucklefucks if they ever run into a Djinni or a cursed monkey’s paw.
Could be wrong but this does not sound sound outlandish for a alpha. There should be no point to ruin a name/brand before it is out. You should not leave a “review” of a unfinished product.
If the product is unfinished, why is it being released to the public, in any capacity?
If they want to playtest and find bugs in their unfinished product, they should do that. By paying a QA team and playtesters, not by trying to dupe streamers into generating free advertisement.
You have never played an early alpha of a game and signed a NDA to not disclose it I did this with many games the finals, th division heatland, x defient, arc raiders etc. although in those case since there are yt videos and streams seems a little weird. I was uneducated the games I am talking about when I played had watermarks on them and were made for testing etc had no idea the game was like viewable. In this case it looks more like if tarkov or an EA game said you can’t leave reviews
This is just my opinion but most comic book based games suck anyway.
I think we should rename this community “gaming controversies” because that’s all that’s ever discussed here.
I’m just curious, what exactly would you prefer to see here? I don’t think this community is specific controversies, but I do think it is, and rightly so, mostly focused on gaming discussion rather than just games. And contentious topics are simply famously those which cause and often merit the most discussion.
Would you prefer instead if all of the posts were simply “How Great Is God of War?” followed by a chain of comments saying nothing but agreement?
I’m excited about the Paradox sale this weekend. Haven’t seen that mentioned anywhere on Lemmy🤷
I was in his stream when people sent him the contract they signed just to get the key. Wild. The game is janky looking as fuck so they definitely know how bad it is.
Aww, the Devs feelings might get hurt
The developers of the game had zero input on this. They’re developers; this is a contract which would be written by lawyers, directed by management. The same management who force crunch on the devs you want to blame. Learn to recognise the enemy, please and thanks.
Management is part of the development team… Developers doesn’t just mean programmers.
A director of a project is still management, but also a developer.
Nah, this is a pathetic attempt to get free ads from games journalists without any downsides
Don’t worry folk’s. We pay taxes so that the FTC and FCC gotz our backz broz.
Do they have our back though?
Does the contract also require a review to be made at all?
Iron Man is shooting green lasers? wtf?
It’s one of the reasons that nobody says anything bad about the product that their sponsor provided to them. Either that or people don’t want to ruin their relationship with their sponsors so they will talk highly of a product even if it isn’t good.
IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 6 months ago
No satire either??
So you can say nothing but praises for the game, but if they detect sarcasm, you’re STILL getting sued?