Peer review can be fun

Comments

• DaddleDew@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Could it be some sort of meta joke where the review is reviewing itself?

  source

  • Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I bet it’s a form with multiple entries, each entry is not different enough of the other ones:

    How is the subject of this paper ?
    What about the style ?
    You checked to reject it, why should it be rejected ?
    What’s the overall comment ?

    Then it’s all concatenated into one blob of review.

    source
• Xantar@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Not to mention it is poorly written.

  source

  • vk6flab@lemmy.radio ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    … not forgetting that it’s poorly laid out.

    source

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      …and also poorly written

      source
• Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It’s like they were trying to do a compliment sandwich but the best compliment they come up with is “poorly written.”

  source

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Bun: it’s poorly written

    Middle: you are bad at this

    Bun: it’s poorly written and poorly motivated and wrong

    source
  • synae@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’ll take what I can get

    source
• nxdefiant@startrek.website ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Wrongly motivated?

  source

  • anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Lads doing science to get laid, I think.

    source

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      They’re certainly not in it for the money

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• iAvicenna@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  As a large language model, I find this paper to be poorly written.

  source
• Rolando@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Funny thing: it took me a while to figure out why this was noteworthy. I think that my brain must have a pre-processor for reading language written by someone for whom English is a second language, which automatically kicked in.

  For better or for worse, these days the writer of this review would just put it through a GPT before sending it.

  source

  • kender242@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Could it be sarcastic that the review is also poorly written?

    source
  • SavedKriss@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It looks likee the writer already put it through GPT. GPT 2 to be precise. :D

    source
  • Trafficone@slrpnk.net ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The dang old ESL filter makes it impossible to recognize bad English out in public. My wife got a shit that reads “force of the nature” and neither of our brains perceived the “the”

    source

    • Flummoxed@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      You get odd phrases on your shit?? 😁

      source
• moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  rimworld

  source
• boardgamesareawesome@lemmy.ca ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I thought this was a review for a bible.

  source