Submitted 2 weeks ago by Kolanaki@yiffit.net to [deleted]
Think of the universe as a painting. There’s the image made in paint, and the surface it was painted on. The canvas.
The stars, the planets, the gasses, the matter and energy and even the space between are the paint. What’s the canvas? Is there a canvas? Would the canvas follow the same rules as the paint?
The ‘canvas’ which everything else resides upon is currently thought to be Quantum Fields: Quantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Universe - with David Tong.
A Field is something that permeates the entire universe. There’s thought to be a field for every particle in the Standard Model. Electron, photon, charm, up, etc. A particle forms when the field is excited, and these particles interact with each other to form the universe.
Dark energy…maybe. Unfortunately scientists don’t really know what it is or if it even exists. It’s somewhat controversial, but theoretical/mathematical indirect evidence points to the possibility. Sabine Hossenfelder on YouTube can explain this stuff far more intelligently and in more detail than I can.
One thing I try to keep in mind is: the observable universe is unfathomably vast… but that’s just the stuff we can detect with instruments. The “canvas” could easily exist beyond our limited abilities to measure or comprehend.
While I think I know what you mean when you say “canvas”, a physicist would probably want a more specific question. It could get into string theory and all kinds of weird stuff that’s way beyond my knowledge.
I don’t know. It’s seemed fine to me. :)
What’s simple to some people may not be as simple to others. That’s why this community exists.
This is more like a question someone who ate too many pot brownies asks. It’s not deep.
There may not be stupid questions but there are stupid comments.
Lol came here to say something similar.
The universe is an imbalance of humors within the aether.
It sure does feel like there isn’t enough humor in the aether.
You may want to look up “event horizon”.
Great movie.
The universe IS the canvas. Everything else that was added to it (stars, planets, supernovas, black holes, gases, etc) is the paint.
There might be a copy of this canvas, but we can’t know unless someone manages to prove that you can travel between universes. And even then, it’s likely just either our universe with very small but effective modifications, or it’s a segment of our imagination.
Well if you think of our universe as a flat image, you could technically picture it as an ever expanding “canvas” ,like the reddit and lemmy thing, and as all the other planets and stars change and move so does that magical canvas of the universe.
MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
I believe what you are looking for is spacetime which is the foundation that all of the universe exists on. My layman’s understanding is that objects with mass “curve” or “bend” spacetime around them and this is actually how gravity effects objects. An object moving along a straight path (from it’s perspective if on a small enough scale) which is actually following a curved path of spacetime will move in a curved path.
Image
This gives a visual representation of the curving of spacetime.
Image
This shows how a super massive object like a white dwarf or black hole distorts and eventually “breaks” spacetime.
themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Excellent comment, love the diagrams.
But we know spacetime is getting bigger, because the universe is expanding. So what is spacetime expanding into?
MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
Who knows? Are we in a bubble floating in a higher dimensional sea of different bubbles? Is it nothing, like a balloon expanding in the vacuum of space?
oo1@kbin.social 2 weeks ago
As i understand it it (somewhere between barely and not at all) the idea is not that It's "expanding" in the sense of a balloon inflating into the space around it.
Its more stretching internally.
So the distance (or time it would take at constant speed) between any 2 points is geting bigger.
You could maybe also say it'd take more energy to move between the points in a set time.
There's probably nothing outside, but the distances inside get longer.
It's probably something to go with gravity, momentum and entropy. The actual concept of "distance" between things might not be what we think.
But all these theories give rise to the concet of large amounts ob unobserved 'dark' mattter and evergy, so the actual basis of currently observable fact (i.e. energy / mass) is a small fraction of what is needed for these theories to work.
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 weeks ago
How do quantum physics play with spacetime?
I’m probably not asking the right question for what I mean… For context, I originally thought of the question when reading a science post on quantum physics vs general relativity and how they don’t mesh and wondered “could we be seeing the medium simply behaving differently than the art?”
MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
My understanding is that quantum physics is the study of the incredibly small, and general and special relativity are the study of everything else. They don’t overlap (rules for big don’t work for small, and vice versa) and are two separate understandings. Which is why the, hopefully, next big thing will be a unifying theory that applies to everything. I believe Stephen Hawking was a well known scientist working on finding a universal theory.
Which doesn’t really answer your question, but it’s a question far surpassing my knowledge. I think quantum mechanics just doesn’t interact with spacetime, or at least not in a meaningful way (mass of an electron is so incredibly small it isn’t perceptively effected by spacetime curves).
I would be happy for someone with more knowledge to come and prove me wrong though, these are fascinating fields.
Gerudo@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
That is the key to almost everything. Quantum mechanics is neat and tidy. Space time is neat and tidy. They don’t play well with each other, though. Some scientists say that we need to figure out dark matter and dark energy to make them play together. Others say they are so incompatible that we need new science altogether to figure it out.
bartolomeo@suppo.fi 2 weeks ago
In the first picture, the object in orbit is travelling along, say, y=0. There could also be an object in orbit along x=0, right? So that would mean there isn’t a “canvas” or 2D equivalent, since things can orbit at any angle. Is that right?