AI as a technology is fascinating and can be extremely useful, especially in places like the medical field. AI as a product in its current state is nothing more than dystopian plagiarism.
Comment on Dreams come true
OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 years ago
Honestly sometimes I feel like I’m the only one on Lemmy who likes AI
lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 years ago
driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 years ago
The company I work for recently rolled up copilot and is have been a mixed bag of reactions, the less savvy user were first blowed up by the demonstration but then got exasperated when it didn’t worked as they tough (one of them uploaded an excel file and asked to some analysis it couldn’t do, and came to me to complain about it), but for me, and my team had worked great. I’ve been uploading some of my python and SQL scripts and asking for refactoring and adding comments, or uploading my SQL script and some example I found on stackoverflow and asking for it to apply the example method on my script.
I said to everyone that if they don’t know shit, the AI isn’t not going to help a lot, but if you have at least the basic, the AI would help you a lot.
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
even just on simple stuff I asked it to generate a description on something like
if x then set z to null
and it returned
“this will set z to null if x is true or false”
like easy to edit, but you have to pay attention.
AbeilleVegane@beehaw.org 2 years ago
I like AI. But I’m not sure I like the way we use it if it’s only to meet shareholders’ expectations or to be a tool for greedy people. What is your opinion concerning the way we seem to use AI in academic research?
MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 years ago
Found the black and white only guy.
JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 2 years ago
AI absolutely has its benefits, but it’s impossible to deny the ethical dilemma in forcing writers to feed their work to a machine that will end up churning out a half assed version that also likely has some misinformation in it.
Jaderick@lemmy.world 2 years ago
And will likely take their professions
JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 2 years ago
I don’t think so, at least for a little bit. Big cooperation will surely try to market it that way, but we’ve already seen how badly AI can shit the bed when it feeds on its own content
Fermion@feddit.nl 2 years ago
The trouble is that a fad doesn’t have to be functional to be used by short-sighted trend chasers as a justification to make cuts. How many jobs did we see outsourced to India in a way that didn’t even come close to matching the quality of the people laid off? The people who make the decision to replace jobs with ai systems will loudly declare success and move on to their next role before the long-term consequences are fully realized.
Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 2 years ago
It will take some people’s professions. People who write click bait articles, schlock product reviews, and pulp romance novels, and the things modern Hollywood describe as scripts might be out of a job.
Quality novels, hard-hitting journalism, and innovative storytelling of all sorts is outside of the capability of LLMs and might always be. There’s a world where nearly all run-of-the-mill writing is done by LLMs, but truly original works will always be made by people.
At the end of the day, though, if a person can’t out-write an AI they might be in the wrong line of work.
coffee_whatever@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Remember! It’s not AI hallucinations, it’s simply bullshit!