Comment on Praise Sheezus

Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  The New Mexico whiptail is also an F1 hybrid. If they go extinct, you can make more by hybridizing a little striped whiptail and a western whiptail. In case anyone thought that ‘species’ was a solidly defined word.

  source

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    F1 hybrid

    Plug-in formulas

    source
  • Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Laugh’s in mule

    source

    • abbadon420@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Ee ah ah ah

      source
  • OozingPositron@feddit.cl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    >F1 hybrid

    youtu.be/gEzXrDL4F3k?t=4s

    source
• Caboose12000@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Wasn’t this also like the inciting incident for the original jurassic park movie?

  source

  • Khanzarate@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Nah.

    That one was dinosaurs changed gender to male, citing the frog DNA they completed the chain with as having that potential.

    So what was supposed to be an all-female park to prevent reproduction became co-ed and then nature happened.

    source

    • Caboose12000@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I’m still confused on the difference

      source

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Jurassic Park’s version is still sexual reproduction. Parthenogenesis is a form of asexual reproduction.

        source
      • lakemalcom10@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Parthenogenesis - egg just becomes embryo, no male required

        Jurassic Park - one individual turned from female to male and started making babies

        source
      • homesnatch@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        One was direct development of an egg into an embryo, the other was conversion of an animal from one sex to another to facilitate mating.

        source
  • StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    No, in Jurassic Park African frogs are used as the genetic gap filler, these frogs (and therefore the dinosaurs) are able to change sex in same sex environents

    source
• mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Man so jesus was real

  source

  • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Genomic imprinting says no. It wouldn’t produce a fetus that is in congruence with the possibility of life. It could at most start growing and developing, but it would die in the womb. More akin to a tumor than to a baby.

    source

    • oce@jlai.lu ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      How comes it’s possible for a bird or a fish, but not a human? If this article explains why, it is a bit obscure for non specialists.

      source

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        No worries the whole concept of parthenogenesis is a really obscure and obtuse one.

        Here’s a SciShow link that does a really good job of describing it in a less obtuse and confusing way.

        source
    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Good to know. Didn’t expect a serious reply

      source
• Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Interesting fact about the NM whiptail, they still need to have sex to reproduce for some reason, despite no gene swap occurring.

  source
• DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  And with our votes combined, we will push this good scoop to the top! Thanks, friend!

  source