But then I wouldn’t have had the opportunity to dump an attache case full of grenades on the head of the last boss in Resident Evil 4!
Comment on Anon has a realization
Paradachshund@lemmy.today 5 months ago
I say this as a game designer: use the stuff you get. That’s why we put it there. You’ll get more, we promise.
vithigar@lemmy.ca 5 months ago
Naboo_calls_for_aid@sopuli.xyz 5 months ago
You don’t fill your attache case with fish?
imecth@fedia.io 5 months ago
This is a game design failure, it's why max ammo is a thing.
Paradachshund@lemmy.today 5 months ago
I’m not sure what you mean. You’re saying it’s a failure if the game doesn’t limit what you can carry?
imecth@fedia.io 5 months ago
In fps games ? Absolutely. By adding a limit you're telling your player to use it, or lose it. Gotta protect players from themselves.
Unfortunately it's hard to apply to some types of games, like crpgs which are notoriously bad at giving random shit that you might one day need.intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 months ago
There should be some kind of mechanic where you can put the thing somewhere and retrieve it later. Sort of like a ender chest, but with multiple, mutually-exclusive repositories.
For example, you could sell the item to a particular NPC, and someone else from the NPC’s same guild in a different city might have the item, but only if you ask about unusual items. “Oh yeah I bought this the other day from my counterpart in Lombard: <the item you sold>”
Some way to free up inventory, and take a chance the item will still be in your world later.
Paradachshund@lemmy.today 5 months ago
Ok cool, I definitely agree in most cases. Limitations create choices, and choices are what create meaningful gameplay.
I don’t think you can use this as a blanket statement, though, even if I usually prefer it personally. Some people absolutely despise inventory management, and that’s fair.
I also don’t think inventory limits totally get rid of the hoarding thing. For people who hoard to an extreme it can create a lot of distress for them, and they probably won’t enjoy the game as much. They still try and hoard, and end up having to leave things behind or throw things away, still never using them. It’s not an easy problem to solve.
It sounds like we have a similar preference though, and I agree that it can be really good design to limit people to create a more powerful experience. It’s certainly the way I design in general.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 months ago
I say this as an old timer: use the stuff you get. That’s why you have the urge now. You won’t get more, I promise.
pyre@lemmy.world 5 months ago
are you talking about my dick
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
Final Attack materia from ff7 has entered the chat.
Paradachshund@lemmy.today 5 months ago
Old games definitely were much more comfortable with missable very important items. There’s a certain magic to it, but it can definitely feel pretty bad.
borth@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
And then there are games like… Oh, you sold that quest item? Tough luck, restart the whole game and make better decisions lol
Paradachshund@lemmy.today 5 months ago
Yeah that’s definitely no good. Thankfully zorking yourself is basically unheard of in modern game design.
mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 5 months ago
Yeah but achievements exist.
Maybe I did need to carry that garden gnome throughout the entire game and send it into space.
Paradachshund@lemmy.today 5 months ago
I hadn’t really thought of them that way before but you’re right. That is often where the missable stuff is now.
Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Then you could get some replay value out of the game. Sometimes I find having goals in the game can help motivate the desire to play, even if I don’t end up going for them.
Liz@midwest.social 5 months ago
I miss the old games that didn’t make winning inevitable.
XTL@sopuli.xyz 5 months ago
We know that you are brave, but you might want to save.