Don’t support shitty youtube. It sucks since googol bought it.
Comment on Is this a rope hanging under a helicopter?
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
[For people wanting the answer[(www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-_7y0WUnW4)
for people who don't want to click the link
It’s B.
macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
turdas@suppo.fi 2 weeks ago
You are literally 20 years late with this opinion.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Don’t tell me what to do.
Especially, don’t tell me what to do, without a functional alternative, and most certainly without giving me a good reason to do it.
And absolutely don’t tell me what to do without giving me a reason or functional alternative multiple times in low effort copy pasta comments.
fizzle@quokk.au 2 weeks ago
It’s a meme.
meekah@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
there are 2 answers depicted under the option you claim to be correct. one of those answers is indeed correct, but it is not really clear which one from your answer.
clear answer
it is the straight diagonal.
tyler@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
Don’t support Veritasium
orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
What’s the story? What’d they do?
turdas@suppo.fi 2 weeks ago
Sold out to some venture capital firm.
tyler@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
I didn’t know he did that. He was shit long before that. Here’s my comment:
timestatic@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
So what? If he gets a good offer for what he built, why shouldn’t he be allowed to sell his own channel. His content is still good. I prefer independent creators but he’s in full right to sell of what he made. He doesn’t owe the community content or to stay independent
Djehngo@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I hate this so much,
Someone is mentioned on Lemmy and there is always a drive by comment saying don’t support X or X is a bad person with no context whatsoever. No mention of what specifically they are accused of doing/saying, no way to figure out if that clashes with your values or not, no documentation etc.
And subjectively it feels like half the time I research why this might be true it’s debatable at best, I assume because if there was compelling evidence the person doing the drive by would have linked it.
Agent641@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Don’t support u/Agent641
orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Lemmy sometimes feels like one big ball of barely seething social outrage.
sheepishly@fedia.io 2 weeks ago
I should start replying to random shit with "don't support X" with no context or followup
TootSweet@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Don’t support Djahngo.
(Kidding. Kidding.)
LytiaNP@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Personally I’ve noticed topics covered by smaller content creators, explaining almost the exact same thing (minus maybe a few details like some random guy’s age), uploaded a few weeks before, and then suddenly Veritasium decides to cover the topic with basically the exact same info over a longer time span.
Not to mention the clickbait titles and thumbnails, less focus on the technical side of topics and more on the emotional/personal side, and the whole selling out to private equity thing.
Hupf@feddit.org 2 weeks ago
Aren’t they also bought out by private equity?
tyler@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
He created fake science experiments to sell products and slipped them into normal videos, like the video where he claimed wet wipes are flushable, then created a fake experiment “proving” they were flushable. He’s incredibly untrustworthy and also, not a scientist! He’s an art major or business, can’t remember which.
KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
According to Wikipedia
turdas@suppo.fi 2 weeks ago
To be fair some wet wipes are flushable (as in they disintegrate when flushed), the problem is that not all of them are and there’s no standard they have to adhere to, so even the ones that shouldn’t be flushed are allowed to advertise themselves as flushable.
cRazi_man@europe.pub 2 weeks ago
Dont know if theres anything else, but I’ve seen the criticism covered in this Tom Nicholas video. I still watch Veritasium though.
TachyonTele_Esq@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
I know they’ve been wrong a couple times. Take anything the channel says with some salt.
SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
like you hopefully do with all things you see online, right?
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
And why would that be?
NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
Personally, I just don’t like the guy and his vibes. But I wouldn’t tell random people online to avoid him, he’s not that bad.
There was also that self-driving car video which turned out to be really scummy.
SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
people are annoyed that he sold to a venture capital business
but then not realizing that so far, their quality improved, while also releasing more videos
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
i liked his older videos far more, so quality is definitely subjective. it was one guy’s channel about physics with specific vibe, now it is just general channel about everything, indistinguishable from all the other science channels…
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
which is funny because that’s most established content on YT, whether you realize it or not.
tyler@programming.dev 2 weeks ago
He created fake science experiments to sell products and slipped them into normal videos, like the video where he claimed wet wipes are flushable, then created a fake experiment “proving” they were flushable. He’s incredibly untrustworthy and also, not a scientist! He’s an art major or business, can’t remember which.
macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Don’t support shitty youtube. It sucks since googol bought it.
athatet@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
That’s the number not the company.
macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Don’t support shitty youtube. It sucks since googol bought it.